🤣 should we get a list of foss projects that have had security issues?
Stop this nonsense. You can hate Microsoft for legitimate reasons.
Comment on St. Paul, MN, was hacked so badly that the National Guard has been deployed
Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Oh wonderful. Replacing all IT because they were hacked? Let me guess, they will use Windows, Exchange, and MS Office again on the new system. The software triumvirate screaming “please hack me”.
🤣 should we get a list of foss projects that have had security issues?
Stop this nonsense. You can hate Microsoft for legitimate reasons.
I mean… For real, I’ve never heard of Linux systems being hacked this way. I’m sure it’s possible, but it certainly seems rarer.
Slipping shit in upstream also certainly doesn’t happen "that* often. It takes effort to become recognised enough as a developer to be allowed access to the upstream code, meaning you can’t automate those kinds of attacks. (I imagine. Correct me if I’m wrong.)
Absolute opposite. The majority of successful attacks you see today are identity management and supply chain attacks. If you walk into any OCIO office supply chain will be a top 3 concern.
I know of one successful supply chain attack in FOSS.
So still points for using it.
I… Don’t understand what you said here 🫤
It does happen occasionally, from time to time, but, because everything is gasp open source, it tends to get caught, identified, blocked/quarantined and then fixed considerably more rapidly, with decent fallback instructions/procedures in that interim period.
Also, you can basically describe the entire CrowdStrike fiasco as exactly this kind of upstream oopsie doopsie.
Doesn’t really matter in the big picture if it was intentionally malicious or not, when you Y2K 1/4 of the world’s computer systems.
Microsoft is getting hacked every other week.
As well as FoSS projects.
Mate have a look at the SharePoint vulnerability. It’s embarrassingly bad. Like really really bad, and btw so bad that it’s very easy to understand and exploit. And prevent too, if a jr in my team did this I’d get them in trouble.
No no, you don’t get it.
Random Windows ‘Powerusers’ obviously know more about programming and cybersecurity than people who actually do that for a living, duh!
See, I wrote a bash file once, so I basically know everything about software dev, especially on linux as well, which is basically just the whole OS is powershell, right?
/s/s/s
derry@midwest.social 3 days ago
Project manager: at least I can blame the vendor
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 days ago
Entirely seriously, yes.
Most project managers I’ve ever met or known or worked with are basically incompetent technically, and very insecure / in denial about that, and thus vastly prefer the ‘safe’ option of someone else being responsible over the ‘risk’ of… hiring actual quality people that can make/support their own quality product.
Saleh@feddit.org 3 days ago
Did you consider that project managers often have to follow all sorts of company standards, have to figure out a way to get a dozen departments with conflicting standards together, on top of that have to catch the stupid ideas from the upper-management and marketing without telling the upper-management that they have no idea what they are talking about, on top of getting something actually done in the project?
Because often the level of tech competency has very little to do with the decision corridor that the project manager has, given everything else.
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 days ago
Yep.
I’ve been one.
Thats how I know what I am saying.
Like you’re not even challenging what I’m saying really, you admit that most PMs are technically incompetent, because their job is mainly playing office politics.
It didn’t used to be this way.
And it still doesn’t have to be.
A good PM is someone who actually knows their relevant field, and can also do some office politics, but much more importantly, is a responsible and helpful team leader.
A person with only an MBA just has a degree in how to play office politics and gaslight people.