Comment on Uber Eats is adding AI to menus, food photos, and reviews

IllNess@infosec.pub ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

• Zizzy@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I mean, the US has similar laws too. It just doesnt matter.

  source

  • IllNess@infosec.pub ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I did more research and you are correct.

    15 U.S. Code § 52 - Dissemination of false advertisements - (a) Unlawfulness - It shall be unlawful for any person, partnership, or corporation to disseminate, or cause to be disseminated, any false advertisement—.

    Source:law.cornel.edu

    Okay. Good.

    The term “false advertisement” means an advertisement, other than labeling, which is misleading in a material respect; and in determining whether any advertisement is misleading, there shall be taken into account (among other things) not only representations made or suggested by statement, word, design, device, sound, or any combination thereof, but also the extent to which the advertisement fails to reveal facts material in the light of such representations or material with respect to consequences which may result from the use of the commodity to which the advertisement relates under the conditions prescribed in said advertisement, or under such conditions as are customary or usual.

    Source:law.cornel.edu

    Good. Good.

    if such violation is with intent to defraud or mislead, be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction shall be punished by a fine of not more than $5,000 or by imprisonment for not more than six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment;

    Source:law.cornel.edu

    No! No! No! So a corporation can just pay $5,000 and throw a designer, who was only following directions, under a bus?!

    source

    • Landless2029@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Fees should be based on revenue and scale up on repeat offenses. Otherwise it’s just “the cost of doing business”

      source

      • IllNess@infosec.pub ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        And this is how it should be with all monetary punishments.

        source
      • wewbull@feddit.uk ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Also, that’s $5000 in 1994 money (if not older).

        Surely fines should scale with inflation.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Because we forgot how effective public lynchings can be.

  source

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    When a certain saint allegedly shot a CEO dead on the street, there was a big surge in support. Sadly, no one else has followed suit.

    A lot of people are sick of the ownership class ruining everything, and would cheer for spilled blood.

    If someone shot the ceo of uber dead, people would celebrate. They’re all scum.

    source

    • SheeEttin@lemmy.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Well, someone did just follow suit.

      source
• AndiHutch@lemmy.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Why can’t the people we vote for represent us?

  Politicians were never meant to represent us (the people). We the people was war propaganda to revolt against the English and their king. They have, since the founding of the US, represented the business owners (landowners). And even after giving women and black people the right to vote, the system still mostly represents the interest of the business owners.

  Bug report closed: System works as intended.

  For the politicians to actually represent us, we the people would need to have some sort of broad agreement on what we do and do not want. But unfortunately, the people don’t have the needed experience or education to come to that agreement. So instead we get 2 different flavors of politicians serving the owners and none serving the people. Pick your favorite team, but they do not currently represent the people’s interest, instead they represent the business owners’ interests.

  As a people, our job is to attempt to bend the politicians and business owners’ to our will using what we currently have at our disposal: our actions and our words. But that still won’t get anywhere without many other people backing up our actions and our words with their actions and words. It won’t be easy, but it is necessary if we want to shape our societies future. If we don’t do it, we get shadowy groups like the heritage foundation doing it for the business owners and pushing it on our leaders.

  Also the politicians’ job is largely dependent upon them listening to the demands of the businesses lobbyist as of now. If they don’t follow their wishes they can expect a harder battle to keep their seat. They would get less big campaign donations and stronger primary challengers as a result of their noncompliance. This makes our job harder since it is difficult to get them to understand something when their job and salary depends upon them not understanding it.

  source
• breecher@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Why can’t the people we vote for represent us?

  That is easy (for the US at least). Politicians in the US doesn’t get elected by a majority.

  source