Comment on Substack prompted a Nazi blog again

• wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  You absolutely can and should regardless.

  source

  • tisktisk@piefed.social ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I almost fully agree
    Idk about 'should' just out of paranoia that I can imagine a case where criticizing without sufficient contrast or a consistent-enough background of otherness, could potentially have unintended consequences or surprisingly negative overall moral impacts
    Or maybe just paranoid idek

    source
• Paradox@lemdro.id ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Ghost, tumblr, WordPress, any of the self hosted SSGs out there.

  source
• Passerby6497@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Lol, I can absolutely call a website (or argument) awful or absolutely moronic without providing an alternative.

  As a wise man once said, I don’t need to be a pilot to know a helicopter doesn’t belong in a tree.

  source
• Guidy@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Fucking watch me.

  Nazis bad. <- note the period that makes that a full sentence.

  Don’t use substack. Or Twitter.

  source
• prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Maybe I’m mistaken, but couldn’t you just use like… Fucking SquareSpace or some shit, and just make a blog on your own site?

  source
• iii@mander.xyz ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Jekyll

  source
• null@lemmy.nullspace.lol ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Lol what? Are you saying Substack is the only blogging platform that exists?

  source