Comment on Substack prompted a Nazi blog again

Paradox@lemdro.id ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

• tisktisk@piefed.social ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Can't criticize unless an alternative is provided tho, can you?

  source

  • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    You absolutely can and should regardless.

    source

    • tisktisk@piefed.social ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      I almost fully agree
      Idk about 'should' just out of paranoia that I can imagine a case where criticizing without sufficient contrast or a consistent-enough background of otherness, could potentially have unintended consequences or surprisingly negative overall moral impacts
      Or maybe just paranoid idek

      source
  • Paradox@lemdro.id ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Ghost, tumblr, WordPress, any of the self hosted SSGs out there.

    source
  • Passerby6497@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Lol, I can absolutely call a website (or argument) awful or absolutely moronic without providing an alternative.

    As a wise man once said, I don’t need to be a pilot to know a helicopter doesn’t belong in a tree.

    source
  • Guidy@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Fucking watch me.

    Nazis bad. <- note the period that makes that a full sentence.

    Don’t use substack. Or Twitter.

    source
  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Maybe I’m mistaken, but couldn’t you just use like… Fucking SquareSpace or some shit, and just make a blog on your own site?

    source
  • iii@mander.xyz ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Jekyll

    source
  • null@lemmy.nullspace.lol ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Lol what? Are you saying Substack is the only blogging platform that exists?

    source