Comment on I totally missed the point when PeerTube got so good

• Eyekaytee@aussie.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  What do you mean?

  source

  • spankmonkey@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Go ask chatGPT

    source

    • Eyekaytee@aussie.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      I don’t use ChatGPT, I use LM Studio which runs Local LLMs (it’s like AI you can run locally on your PC, I have solar and a solar battery so this means there’s no co2 emissions from my queries, I primarily use this for coding questions and practice, translations from Russian/Ukrainian/French, practising french, etc), then I use mistral AI second (french based), then third perplexity (american)

      I also use Ecosia.org for searches as well

      I asked mistralai/mistral-small-3.2 to elaborate on what you said, Is this what you meant?

      The phrase “Let’s just keep adding more and more layers like a game of telephone!” is a metaphorical way of expressing skepticism or concern about the accuracy and reliability of information as it gets passed through multiple layers of interpretation, especially when involving AI systems.

      Here’s what it likely means in this context:

      1. Game of Telephone Analogy: In the classic “game of telephone” (or “Chinese whispers”), a message is whispered from one person to another in a line, and by the time it reaches the end, the original message is often distorted or completely changed due to mishearing, misinterpretation, or intentional alteration. The user is suggesting that relying on AI systems to search, summarize, or interpret web content might introduce similar layers of potential inaccuracies or biases.

      2. Layers of Interpretation: The “layers” could refer to the steps involved in using an AI system to access and summarize information:

         • The original web content (first layer).
         • The AI’s interpretation or summarization of that content (second layer).
         • Any further human interpretation or sharing of the AI’s output (additional layers).

      3. Concerns About Accuracy: The user might be implying that each additional “layer” (especially when involving AI) could introduce errors, biases, or misinterpretations, much like how a message gets distorted in the game of telephone.

      4. Hostility Toward AI: Given the context you provided (Lemmy users being “strongly anti-AI”), this comment likely reflects a broader distrust of AI’s ability to accurately and reliably convey information without introducing new problems.

      In essence, the user is cautioning against blindly trusting AI systems to handle information retrieval and summarization, suggesting that doing so could lead to a breakdown in accuracy or meaning, similar to how a message degrades in a game of telephone.

      Image

      source

      • spankmonkey@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        I don’t use ChatGPT

        Then why are you defending it? Is it necessary for every complaint about AI to have a wall of text clarifying that when we are complaining about extremely common issues with AI that is being forced on everyone that we are using shorthand for those specific issues for those AI implementations based on the context of what is currently being discussed?

        In this case I am specifically complaining about ChatGPT and similar implementations. Kind of like when I complain about IPA beers I’m not complaining about every single beer that has ever been made.

        Yes, the summary is right but also extremely verbose and redundant. Like the first or very last sentence covered everything. Like how many times does it need to repeat the same thing over and over again?

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • hisao@ani.social ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        LM Studio looks cool, but I wonder, why their GUI app isn’t open-source? Also their site has careers section, where do they get money to operate like that? Couldn’t find anything about their monetization model.

        source

        • -> View More Comments