Comment on Realized 99% of all my chargers are USB-C. This can only mean one thing. New USB bout to drop!

hbar@lemmy.ml ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

• pelya@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Image

  Here, USB-C++

  source

  • bitjunkie@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    This pic gave me an aneurysm irl

    source
• bitjunkie@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Please anything but USB Objective-C

  source

  • MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Wish granted: You get USB Interactive-C

    source
• frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  C started as B, which came from BCPL. The successor should be called “P”.

  “USB P” would be easily confused with “USB PD”. The USB Implementers Forum would consider this a feature.

  source
• hakunawazo@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  When USB C#?

  source
• curry@programming.dev ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  USB HolyC, now with more holes.

  source
• ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Then comes USB-D, mostly backwards compatible with USB-C and USB-C++ with an adapter, but due to poor communication from its developers and just being a mostly improved USB-C connector rather than a groundbreaking invention, people lose interest in it. Then comes USB-Rust, with a plug looking like a hybrid between old proprietary plugs of the past and USB-C, while also dropping support for well loved features or making them really hard to use, in the name of variable and memory safety, a thing USB-D also supported optionally.

  source
• InvalidName2@lemmy.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Nah, USB DeezNuts

  source