the ladybird devs have a history of major transphobia though
Comment on Firefox is fine. The people running it are not
neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 week ago
For those holding out for a hero: ladybird.org
Ladybird is a brand-new browser & web engine. Driven by a web standards first approach, Ladybird aims to render the modern web with good performance, stability and security.
cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 week ago
neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 week ago
I think this may be the issue to which you are referring:
hyperborea.org/reviews/…/ladybird-inclusivity/
While this is troubling to read about, this narrative’s lack of evidence or references keep me from accepting it at face value. Old mastodon chatter (and perhaps deleted posts or scuttled instances) may be difficult to retrieve, but GitHub discussions shouldn’t be hard to find.
So I’m withholding judgement for the moment.
cygnus@lemmy.ca 1 week ago
You don’t consider it rather exclusionary to imply that only men use computers?
GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 week ago
at one point or another we all have a penis in us.
NotAnonymousAtAll@feddit.org 1 week ago
some context and/or link would help for everyone who just learned about this project and knows nothing about the devs
fuzz@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
I’ll just copy a comment I made a while back. It was about the usage of “he” instead of gender neutral pronouns in the documentation:
So I looked further into this, and while I found awesomekling’s comment to be a cause of concern, I’m hoping it’s a cultural misunderstanding due to his Swedish background.
That comment is from 3 years ago, and since then there was a commit merged, that had the sole purpose of fixing these pronouns.
cygnus@lemmy.ca 1 week ago
I’m hoping it’s a cultural misunderstanding due to his Swedish background.
Jag pratar inte Svenska but I know enough that it has gendered pronouns just like English. Actually, it’s better than English in that it preserved the neuter singular pronoun (which used to be “thou” in English)
cygnus@lemmy.ca 1 week ago
There was a pull request to change “he” to “they” somewhere in the code and the dev refused, saying people should leave “their politics” out of it. I wouldn’t say it’s transphobic specifically - it may also be misogynistic. Either way, it doesn’t look good.
lime@feddit.nu 1 week ago
i can offer some context to that, but first let’s clear up that all the documentation has since been updated to use second-person pronouns, making it both friendlier and gender neutral. kling is fully on-board with that change.
the issue came in right after the big wave of people doing drive-by “code of conduct” PRs. there was a plague of accounts that only did that, and had no other connections to either projects or people. this is obviously a form of political activism, and while it’s not malicious, it does get in the way for volunteer developers of big open-source projects who are usually already swamped with work they’re not paid for. so creating these giant documents that have not been pre-discussed with the team doing the project is disruptive and misguided. having a code of conduct is good, but it needs to match the project.
anyway, in the middle of this a big PR comes in which changes shitloads of documentation. the standard PR view doesn’t show each change, it just shows “n files changed, +n lines -n lines”, and a description talking about “gender-neutral language”. now, kling is not a “typical” developer. he’s a former addict who started doing serenity and ladybird as therapy/rehab. i don’t know what that’s like, but i imagine it means you don’t have a lot of mental overhead for things you don’t want to do. so kling saw the description and the massive change set and didn’t want to deal with it.
it took a while but he was convinced. if he had not, i would not be as charitable.
GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 week ago
with a project named ladybird you’d think otherwise.
sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
I suppose, unless you’ve watched King of the Hill.
dzso@lemmy.world 1 week ago
If that’s true, shame on them. But it doesn’t mean their browser isn’t good.
pupbiru@aussie.zone 1 week ago
it’s not at all true… it was misunderstanding that people seemed to have blown way out of proportion without understanding context, and now they have A+ policies in place
0x0@infosec.pub 1 week ago
Right, so what does that have to do with ladybird
infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 1 week ago
Why not just run a community build of Firefox, like IceCat?
iopq@lemmy.world 1 week ago
If Firefox doesn’t keep up with web standards, neither will any of the forks
lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 1 week ago
Cold take: we need to stop chasing web Standards that are purposefully set up by big corpo to be exlusionary.
What we need, what Firefox could hope to be, is a browser developed for a new old internet paradigm. Maybe Gopher, or Gemini (the good one). Alternatively a purposefully reduced HTML+CSS, no JS.
Trim down the fat so that it is actually possible to finance the development of a web engine an browser without leeching on a dick corpo (and sabotagong open internet in the process).
lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 1 week ago
Question. Does it have uBO or an equivalent yet?
Without it, it’ll simply not be internet-ready.
rfr_Foglia@feddit.it 1 week ago
Why the downvotes??
TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 week ago
I’m not looking for a hero, I’m looking for stability.
hanke@feddit.nu 1 week ago
Did you read the thing?
qaz@lemmy.world 1 week ago
The fact that it’s claiming to be stable doesn’t mean it is
AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Currently, it’s pretty shit. It starts up in fullscreen with a non managed window, well, fuck that noise.