Comment on AI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon study

• TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  that is such a ridiculous idea. Just because you see hate for it in the media doesn’t mean it originated there. I’ll have you know that i have embarrassed myself by screaming at robot phone receptionists for years now. stupid fuckers pretending to be people but not knowing shit. I was born ready to hate LLMs and I’m not gonna have you claim that CNN made me do it.

  source

  • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Search AI in Lemmy and check out every article on it. It definitely is media spreading all the hate. And like this article is often some money yellow journalism

    source

    • TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      all that proves is that lemmy users post those articles. you’re skirting around psychotic territory here, seeing patterns where there are none, reading between the lines to find the cover-up that you are already certain is there, with nothing to convince you otherwise.

      if you want to be objective and rigorous about it, you’d have to start with looking at all media publications and comparing their relative bias.

      then you’d have to consider their reasons for bias, because it could just be that things actually suck. (in other words, if only 90% of media reports that something sucks when 99% of humanity agrees it sucks, maybe that 90% is actually too low, not too high)

      this is all way more complicated than media brainwashing.

      source
    • davidagain@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      I think it’s lemmy users. I see a lot more LLM skepticism here than in the news feeds.

      In my experience, LLMs are like the laziest, shittiest know-nothing bozo forced to complete a task with zero attention to detail and zero care about whether it’s crap, just doing enough to sound convincing.

      source

      • someacnt@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Wdym, I have seen researchers using it to aid their research significantly. You just need to verify some stuff it says.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        😆 I can’t believe how absolutely silly a lot of you sound with this.

        LLM is a tool. It’s output is dependent on the input. If that’s the quality of answer you’re getting, then it’s a user error. I guarantee you that LLM answers for many problems are definitely adequate.

        It’s like if a carpenter said the cabinets turned out shit because his hammer only produces crap

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• synae@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Whatever gets ad views

  source