Comment on AI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon study
Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 10 months ago😆 I can’t believe how absolutely silly a lot of you sound with this.
LLM is a tool. It’s output is dependent on the input. If that’s the quality of answer you’re getting, then it’s a user error. I guarantee you that LLM answers for many problems are definitely adequate.
It’s like if a carpenter said the cabinets turned out shit because his hammer only produces crap
davidagain@lemmy.world 10 months ago
You have an irrational and wildly inaccurate belief in the infallibility of LLMs.
You’re also denying the evidence of my own experience. What on earth made you think I would believe you over what I saw with my own eyes?
Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Why are you giving it data. It’s a chat and language tool. It’s not data based. You need something trained to work for that specific use. I think Wolfram Alpha has better tools for that.
davidagain@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Because there’s a button for that.
This thing that you said… It’s false.
Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 10 months ago
There’s a sleep button on my laptop. Doesn’t mean I would use it.
I’m just trying to say you’re saying the feature that everyone kind of knows doesn’t work. Chatgpt is not trained to do calculations well.