I think you need to understand the history of science before you debate this argument, you are basically mixing metaphors
Comment on Ethical frameworks are detrimental to Scientific Study because Science is by nature unethical.
Arkouda@lemmy.ca 1 week agoWithout ethics in Science we have a detailed understanding of our anatomy, the ability to transplant organs, numerous life saving medications, space travel, understanding of the human mind, etc.
Fact of the matter is when “ethics” are imposed on Scientific study, Scientific study is hindered, so Scientific study cannot be ethical if it is to be successful.
thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 1 week ago
Arkouda@lemmy.ca 1 week ago
I understand the history of Science which is why I made my OP.
thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 1 week ago
I don’t believe you. And I am done with this debate. You have shown a very good lack of understanding in this brief encounter.
thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 1 week ago
Here is some reading materials for you OP
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11060189/
You only need to read the summery to see why your showerthought is wrong
www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/…/whatis
This has a very comprehensive list of why ethical frameworks are ESSENTIAL to the scientific process
Arkouda@lemmy.ca 1 week ago
its just hard to understand how something so stupid can be said
I don’t care what you believe because you have demonstrated 0 good faith since start.
You can go away now.
Sidhean@lemmy.world 1 week ago
That’s rough, buddy
starlinguk@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Bring back vivisection! (you volunteering?)
You don’t seem to know what ethical means.
Arkouda@lemmy.ca 1 week ago
I know what ethical means. Do you know what asinine means?
Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 week ago
This post is asinine.
Arkouda@lemmy.ca 1 week ago
Glad my post found some common ground with your existence.