Comment on Let people enjoy things 🙄

ExploitedAmerican@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Nah, driving is a privilege, not a right. You don’t NEED to d I’ve and you absolutely don’t need to drive while impaired. Even if you think you’re good, you’re not. There are THOUSANDS of cases of people being killed by drunk drivers who thought they were good.

  source
• axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  ChatGPT, summarize this for me

  source
• DahGangalang@infosec.pub ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Holy no paragraph breaks batman!

  source
• prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Time to lay off the meth, I think…

  source
• Rebecca_Corndogs@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Oh! I know this one! I grew up with an alcoholic narcissist. This is the part where the drunk rants for hours about how unfair the world is and how they’re the real victim.

  You’re not special. You sound exactly like every other “functional” alcoholic right before they end up on the news for killing a mother of two, with a sad faced mugshot, lip poked out like they’re the one who got hurt.

  But hey, what would I know? I’m just a funeral director. It’s not like I have to deal with the aftermath of people like you, right?

  And you’re right—it’s totally unfair to expect you not to drive your drunk ass home. It’s not like you could drink at home, or get a ride, or call an Uber, no! You have to drink and drive. Anything else would be unreasonable.

  source
• Nelots@lemmy.zip ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  the government saying we can make you safer by limiting your behavior is just tyranny

  I know, right? That’s why I should be allowed to wildly swing a machete around public spaces. Because limiting my ability to do so is tyranny!!! And kids should be able to bring grenades to school because we wouldn’t want to impede on their rights! Fucking /s if you couldn’t figure that out.

  And your entire gun analogy makes zero sense. Regardless of anybody’s opinion on gun control laws, it is true that you will be able to better defend yourself against a bad guy with a gun if you also have a gun. But driving while you’re drunk will not make you any safer when the guy in front of you is also drunk. The two subjects are nothing alike.

  source
• TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  What the fuck is all of this? Are you trying to rationalize your own drunk driving?

  You do not understand tolerance. Start here:

  This study demonstrated that heavy social drinkers, categorized by their persistent and predominant adult pattern of drinking and regular bingeing, exhibited comparable alcohol-induced impairment to that of light social drinkers in such areas as fine motor and dexterity skills (Pegboard) and processing and encoding functions (DSST) following consumption of a moderate-to-heavy dose of alcohol (4-5 standard drink equivalent).

  Basically even if you don’t “feel” intoxicated, your psychomotor performance will be impacted as much as anyone else. If anything, it’s more dangerous, because you’re going to be less aware of how intoxicated you are.

  This effect is especially noticeable if you see someone drinking on Vivitrol. They don’t feel drunk, but they keep drinking and slurring their words, stumbling, etc. The way that alcohol affects the limbic system and creates that sense of euphoria is separate from how it affects your motor coordination, and balance, speech, vision, etc.

  DONT DRINK AND DRIVE.

  And if you do, I pray you end up in prison for DUI rather than manslaughter. Fuck you for even spending all that time and effort writing an essay on how reckless use of a deadly weapon in public spaces is okay if you’re an addict.

  source
• sunflowercowboy@feddit.org ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Tl;dr - Selfish person thinks people being fully cognitive while driving a 4,000lb vehicle is silly. Makes argument about how governance doesnt defend your life, while also arguing that they should impede on visibly intoxicated people… Like the thing we already do… That he is arguing against…

  source
• teuniac_@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Given the potential to do harm, driving is a privilege. Personal views on whether one can drive under the influence of substances are irrelevant as vulnerable road users would be exposed to much more risk than the driver. Bystanders pay the risk that’s taken by the driver.

  It would be good if societies would work in a way that acknowledges that not everyone can/should drive or owns a car. This would mean better public transport, improved zoning, better facilities for walking and cycling.

  source
• simple@piefed.social ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I'm not reading all that man

  source