laquadrature.net/…/criminalization-of-encryption-…
For France, Your a terroriste if you use signal
It isn’t.
laquadrature.net/…/criminalization-of-encryption-…
For France, Your a terroriste if you use signal
Then you’re a terrorist if you use the internet, period
Nearly all internet traffic if encrypted, and for plain browser traffic it’s probably in the 95+%
You access your bank? Terrorist! Email? Terrorist! Lemmy? Terrorist!
I dunno, I am not the French state. I can only see that they think the usage of signal is making you a terrorist.
Then you’re also a terrorist if you use The Guardian 🤷♂️
I dont’ know, do you have sources about this ?
Sources for what, exactly? What is “fantasming”? The title of the article you posted is “Criminalization of encryption”. The Guardian is using encryption to send messages, so why would they be exempt? In fact, why would any internet use at all not be criminalized? It’s all encrypted.
eronth@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
It’s a red flag to those who think you’re going to share internal info.
Ulrich@feddit.org 3 weeks ago
Or it’s just a perfectly normal thing that billions of people do every day?
Mynameisallen@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
Except that signal is blocked by many companies Mobile Device Management. The one that don’t can typically see who has the app installed. This provides a new clever way to maybe whistleblow
Broken@lemmy.ml 3 weeks ago
Why would you expect any form of privacy on a device you don’t own?
Ulrich@feddit.org 3 weeks ago
Use a different device? Use Molly? Use any number of other apps?