Comment

Comment on The Guardian and the University of Cambridge Computer Science Department unveil new technology to protect journalists

<- View Parent

Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

Sources for what, exactly? What is “fantasming”? The title of the article you posted is “Criminalization of encryption”. The Guardian is using encryption to send messages, so why would they be exempt? In fact, why would any internet use at all not be criminalized? It’s all encrypted.

source

Sort:hotnew top

Diurnambule@jlai.lu ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
So you read the title and you know everything. That the end for me. Have a great day.

source
- Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  I don’t know everything. Just because it’s not explicitly listed today doesn’t mean it won’t be tomorrow. This was just created yesterday. And it does the same thing that all of those listed apps do: facilitates private communication.
  
  source
  - Diurnambule@jlai.lu ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    Yeah but contrary to these listed, the judge know the guardian is a newspaper, they shouldn’t be able to make him/her afraid in the same way they did.
    
    source
    Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    
    Yeah but contrary to these listed, the judge know the guardian is a newspaper
    
    The logic does not check out. Signal isn’t going to integrate a news section and then suddenly be exempt from this regulation.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments