Firefox + ublock origin + sponsorblock and I haven’t seen an ad on youtube in all the years since I started that combo.
Comment on Google confirms more ads on your paid YouTube Premium Lite soon
BertramDitore@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
Or, and hear me out: just install a browser plugin and forget ads exist.
These companies don’t respect us, so I don’t feel the need to respect them by allowing them to force their meaningless bullshit down my throat.
I don’t use it that much, but you better believe if I go to YouTube to watch a video, that video is the only thing I’m watching.
spankmonkey@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Scrollone@feddit.it 3 weeks ago
Don’t forget about ReVanced and SmartTubeNext (for smart TVs)
IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 3 weeks ago
Yesterday evening I got a pop-up that I should disable ublock from youtube. Refreshing page got rid of that but apparently it’s time for me to run some updates on this thing. I’ve seen that few times, google changes something and as I’m a bit lazy to run updates my system sometimes gives the pop up.
accideath@feddit.org 3 weeks ago
There are people out there Who don’t watch YouTube on their PC. Can’t install a browser plugin on my TV.
breecher@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Well, you shouldn’t watch smart tv anyway. Shut off that slop and use your tv as a dumb tv through a computer. The other way is just asking to be exploited.
accideath@feddit.org 3 weeks ago
That way I won’t get DolbyVision metadata though and getting surround sound workin is a chore, also. Not to speak about comfortable control from my couch without a keyboard/mouse.
Instead, I use an appleTV. It’s ad free, supports all streaming services I need (including my jellyfin) and almost all common video, audio and HDR formats. Even supports VPNs for getting around geofencing.
Besides the initial purchase price (which is steep but there aren’t many comparable devices), not having adblock working in YouTube is really the only actual downside. And for that a few friends and I share a YT family subscription. Has the benefit of my views actually paying the creators for the content they provide me and us not having to pay the ridiculous amounts of solo subscriptions.
Would never use the integrated SmartTV feature of the vast majority of TV manufacturers (LG used to be so good before they put ads everywhere). My TV hasn’t seen an Internet connection even once.
Sekoia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
They’re trying to block adblockers again, it seems. I got the “adblockers are not allowed” popup again recently.
HyperfocusSurfer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
Oh no… Anyways,
* Adds a filter for the pop-up*
asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 3 weeks ago
This ain’t reddit. You can freely name extension names here.
BertramDitore@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
Oh I know, I’ve been here for years despite the age of my account. I just migrated from lemm.ee
I tend not to like to name these types of extensions because more exposure puts them at risk, and they’re super easy to find anyway.
swizzlestick@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
It’s better to name known safe options rather than leave it up to user search. The entities that work against extensions like uBO are already well aware of their existence, so hiding their names has no benefit.
Case in point - uBlock and uBlock Origin are not the same, with the former being a bastardised version that does ‘acceptable ads’. There are plenty of other poor blocking options out there for the unsuspecting to stumble into to besides that.
Personal setup is Librewolf/uBO on the client and pfBlockerNG/Snort for network level blocking/additional security layer.
And welcome to .zip :) Hope you enjoy the new home!
BertramDitore@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
Thanks!
wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
that one meme with the dude surrounded by question marks
asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 3 weeks ago
uBlock is already pretty much known as the best adblocker in the internet. Not sure what more exposure it could get.