The driver isn’t supposed to wait for the car to tell them to take over lol. The driver is supposed to take over when necessary.
No if you look at Waymo as an example, they are actually autonomous, and ask for assistance in situations they are “unsure” how to handle.
But even if you claim was true, in what way was this a situation where the driver could deem it necessary to take over? It was clear road ahead, and nothing in view to indicate any kind of problem, when the car made a sudden abrupt left almost into a tree.
They can’t stop and ass for assistance at 100km/h on a highway.
According to the driver it was on FSD, and it was using the latest software update available.
www.reddit.com/user/SynNightmare/
They can’t stop and ask for assistance at 100km/h on a highway.
Maybe the point is then, that Tesla FSD shouldn’t be legally used on a highway.
But it probably shouldn’t be used anywhere, because it’s faulty as shit.
And why can’t is slow down to let the driver take over in a timely manner, when it can break for no reason.
It was tested in Germany on Autobahn where it did that 8 times within 6 hours!!!
According to the driver, with zero evidence backing up the claim.
SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 1 week ago
The attention required to prevent these types of sudden crashes negates the purpose of FSD entirely.