Comment on [deleted]

oppy1984@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

• MusicSoulEdu@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Definitely found that to be the case so far! Posted the same question to reddit and it was crickets there.

  source

  • oppy1984@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    The reddit A.I. doesn’t know how to respond.

    source
• Gismonda@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Agreed…Lemmy slightly reminds me of the early days of Internet forums/chatrooms/etc.

  Yes, I’m old.

  source

  • oppy1984@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Yep. Also I’m old too, I remember when AIM was going to kill IRC.

    source
• LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  In game theory, a repeated prisoner’s dilemma can become a stag hunt if the probability of future interaction is high enough. Which is essentially what you’re saying.

  source

  • oppy1984@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I’m familiar with the prisoners dilemma but not the stag hunt aspect, I’ll have to take your word for it until I have time to read up on that.

    source

    • LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Prisoner’s dilemmas are interesting because cooperation is socially optimal but not sustained by a Nash equilibrium. Cooperation is fragile. It’s a little “doom and gloom.” Are social species destined to be individualistic selfish assholes?

      Under certain conditions, a repeated prisoner’s dilemma becomes a stag hunt. Stag hunts are interesting because cooperation is, in fact, sustained by a Nash equilibrium. But it’s not for free: there’s also a suboptimal Nash equilibrium that could be hard to get out of.

      But the moral is that there’s incentive to not be an asshole if there’s a high probability of future encounters.

      source

      • oppy1984@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Thanks for the explanation, I finally had a little time to read up on the stag hunt aspect and what I read basically said what you said just in a more long winded way, lol.

        source