Whatever happened to states rights?
Comment on GOP sneaks decade-long AI regulation ban into spending bill - Ars Technica
TachyonTele@lemm.ee 14 hours ago
“no State or political subdivision thereof may enforce any law or regulation regulating artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems, or automated decision systems during the 10 year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.”
Someones taking money for this.
EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
Fascists only use “rights” for themselves, and then they will rub it into your face that they can do something you can’t…
TachyonTele@lemm.ee 10 hours ago
They ditched that as soon as they won the election
henfredemars@infosec.pub 13 hours ago
If only they protected my rights like they protect the rights of corporations.
Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 10 hours ago
AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
Won’t any think of the shareholders? They suffer too. -s
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
That would be extremely out of character for the GOP, why would you even expect that from them?
Mirshe@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
Does this not directly, nakedly violate the sovereignty clause?
Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 10 hours ago
Welp, pack it up kids, this one’s cooked
sunflowercowboy@feddit.org 12 hours ago
Why would they need money? Automating systems removes interpersonal trust and facilitates 1984-esque media and data control. Deregulation means they can use it as a handwavy excuse for a lot of major things, and also impact the information those systems give you.
fluxion@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
We didn’t just not do what all those movies/books warned us to, we made it illegal to take any precautions whatsoever.
Such a stupid fucking timeline.
humanspiral@lemmy.ca 12 hours ago
The bill that makes it illegal for precautions is snuck inside megabill with 100 other bad provisions so no debate occurs on it.
FYI, the US empire is evil. Like media, AI must be used to protect the Empire’s evil.
Coldcell@sh.itjust.works 1 hour ago
I simply don’t understand how “vote to fund thing A” gets conflated with “also pass ultra-evil rule B”. How hard is it to vote on each issue separately and keep shit like this isolated from unrelated legislation?
humanspiral@lemmy.ca 20 minutes ago
The process itself must serve evil. As a process, single issue bills permit a clear stand on good/evil with debate on the issue to convince/justify vote. Multi issue bills permit a horse trade of my evil interests to be included for your evil interest to also be included.
It can backfire though. Too big a deal can get some to leave the corruption consensus over 1 provision included. Everyone is given more power to grandstand against evil.