My problem with it is that it gives a sense of security that does not exist.
Non-Technical folk will click the button and think they’re safe
Comment on Microsoft Teams will soon block screen capture during meetings
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 day ago
“To address the issue of unauthorized screen captures during meetings, the Prevent Screen Capture feature ensures that if a user attempts to take a screen capture, the meeting window will turn black, thereby protecting sensitive information,” Microsoft shared in a new Microsoft 365 roadmap entry.
“This feature will be available on Teams desktop applications (both Windows and Mac) and Teams mobile applications (both iOS and Android).”
Yeah, seems like a perfectly reasonable feature to add. It will also likely be a toggle-able feature switch.
Surely there’s no way Lemmy gets angry at this, right?
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 day ago
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 day ago
My problem with it is that it gives a sense of security that does not exist.
It gives security for 99% of people that will ever be on the calls, and most importantly it gives the company something to point to whenever they get security audits.
taladar@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Especially in the companies with the enterprise warning label non-technical idiots are in charge of setting technical policies because it is all about office politics there.
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 day ago
If a company on enterprise plans has non-IT technical people doing their technical policies then nothing will save them.
Jayb151@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I mean… Would it do the same with a 3rd party screenshot app? Or even something like obs? So many ways around it, no reason to get too upset.
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 day ago
Probably, but won’t really know until it comes out.
phantomwise@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
I really want to dump on them but I can’t find anything wrong with the feature… That’s depressing, I’ll have to look elsewhere for my dose of “MS can’t do anything right lol”
sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
You can just take a picture with a camera, which is included with a device pretty much everyone carries with them every day.
phantomwise@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
Sure, but it takes extra steps and the results won’t be as good as direct screen capture. It won’t stop someone determined, but it’s annoying enough that most people won’t bother.
sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Sure, it keeps honest people honest, but does little if anything to stop the actual problem.
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 day ago
Bit more effort and harder to do when something only briefly flashes on screen than it is to hit the screenshot button on almost every keyboard.
sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
If you know it’s blocked, you can have the camera ready. This is only going to keep honest people honest.
JordanZ@lemmy.world 1 day ago
The feature is fine in theory. In practice, especially with work from home, it’s useless to achieve the goal it set out to. The article even points it out.
Taking photos of screens makes a crappy photo but it’s still a photo of whatever they didn’t want you to take a screenshot of. It’s actually probably worse because now that sensitive info likely isn’t even on a company controlled device anymore and might be uploaded to iCloud or Google automatically because of it.
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 day ago
While true, that doesn’t really matter when it comes to enterprise. For security compliance you have to be shown to be doing everything that you can to prevent security breaches etc. This feature is another tick box that you can show to whoever is doing your audits to show that you are doing it.
Also most people don’t sit there in meetings with their finger on the screenshot key ready to go - but it is simple to just press a screenshot key on your keyboard. It’s a little bit harder to have your phone up and with the camera open the entire time ready to take photos, especially if cameras are on - especially if something just pops up briefly on screen and you realise you want to capture it.
I don’t know your experience in enterprise, but I can tell you that a feature like this will be much applauded by those running companies for the reasons above.
taladar@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Yeah, this is a “feature” for the companies with the “enterprise” warning label who would rather waste a lot of effort on ineffective compliance checklists than actually make sure their software is up-to-date with security fixes.
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 day ago
Nope. Compliance check lists matter when you are audited by external companies for things like PCI. It’s also not a lot of effort, nor is it ineffective, nor is making sure software is up to date ignored.