Why would he get blocked there?
Comment on X.com blocks access to Ekrem Imamoglu, leader of Turkish opposition
muhyb@programming.dev 4 weeks ago
He should go to Bluesky and get blocked there as well.
huppakee@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
muhyb@programming.dev 4 weeks ago
You can check here >> programming.dev/post/28713862
madjo@feddit.nl 4 weeks ago
For some reason that post does show up for me, but I can’t vote on it, because “it’s been removed”. The crosspost offers a 400 error. Really weird.
muhyb@programming.dev 4 weeks ago
Try this one: feddit.nl/post/32346719
Ledericas@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
Bluesk
bluesky will block too.
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 4 weeks ago
He would get blocked there because BlueSky will comply with legal requests as well, because if they don’t they will face criminal charges and/or massive fines. BlueSky, being a platform that loves censorship, would not challenge the legal order in court like X are either.
Ulrich@feddit.org 4 weeks ago
if they don’t they will face criminal charges
The Turkish government does not have the authority to enforce criminal charges on an American person/company.
Even fediverse instance owners would be forced to block his accounts under threat of fines and/or prosecution.
Only if the instance owners/servers were in Turkey.
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 4 weeks ago
Criminal charges was probably the wrong word, but that’s being pedantic. The company operates in Turkey and allows Turkish people to use the product, so they have to follow Turkish laws. The Turkish government can file legal charges against them for failure to comply.
unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 4 weeks ago
I was gonna say. Dude better go to the actual fediverse if he wants a reliable platform that wont be instantly taken down again.