Comment on Tesla bait-and-switch: Cybertruck owners won't get Autosteer feature they paid for

JustJack23@slrpnk.net ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Fully man… fully.

  source
• FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  No it’s not.

  It fully drives itself, but legally you need to “supervise” it. It’s called that because if the laws around driving a car.

  source
• JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  The actual answer: It should be Level 4 autonomy. It is capable of full self driving, but only in certain conditions, and the driver still has to be ready to take over if something goes wrong.

  Do note that Tesla autopilot is actually only SAE level 2, so it’s just a straight up lie :)

  source
• ToastedRavioli@midwest.social ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Its because Elon Musk is an oxy moron

  source
• Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  How can it be both Supervised and Full Self-Driving?

  It is not all the same.

  You are full.
  The car is self driving.
  Tesla’s interns in India are supervising both you and the car.

  source

  • gimmemahlulz@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    But I haven’t eaten since lunch yesterday 🥲

    source

    • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      You know, some are full of solids, some… fluids, and some… even superfluous :)

      source
  • JustJack23@slrpnk.net ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    It finally makes sense

    source

    • Jivebunny@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Just like Amazon’s walk in walk out stores where Indian people did the actual checkout for them…

      source
• patatahooligan@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  It can’t be both. It’s not self-driving. That’s just what they call it to oversell it. I’m assuming they had to add the “Supervised” part for legal reasons.

  source

  • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    They should get fined for being ambiguous and be forced to call it what it is.

    source

    • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      It’s called what it is because of the laws that demand any self driving/automated driving be “supervised” and require regular checks that the driver is paying attention.

      You’re essentially saying that Tesla should be made to do something that they’re already doing.

      source

      • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Supervised self driving would be fine. “Full self driving” means SAE level 4 or 5, which the Tesla autopilot isn’t, and they don’t need “supervised” in the name as they are specifically for a situations where there simply is no driver - like a robotaxi - so there can be no supervision.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• Hominine@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Parentheses, duh.

  source
• taladar@sh.itjust.works ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Supervised Full Self-Driving seems like a euphemism for driving with a driving instructor. You fully drive yourself but someone supervises you while you do it.

  source