Comment on China scientists develop flash memory 10,000× faster than current tech

InFerNo@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

• gwilikers@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Chientists

  source

  • FourWaveforms@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    (acts confused in French)

    source
• pycorax@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Probably because is an ethnicity and nationality. There are ethnic Chinese people all over the world and a few countries and regions are made of a majority of ethnic Chinese but are not related to China. Calling them the same thing is playing into the PRC’s “all ethnic Chinese pledge their allegiance to China” nonsense.

  source

  • saimen@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Isn’t that true for every (older) country though?

    source

    • pycorax@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Perhaps but I haven’t encountered that myself. I’m ethnic Chinese that’s a citizen of another ethnic Chinese majority nation so I’ve encountered this specific type a lot more.

      source
  • Netux@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Isreal like that game of pretend. They believe anti zionist Jews are traitors.

    source
  • pHr34kY@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    It’s a reasonable assumption that someone in China is Chinese.

    source

    • pycorax@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      The reverse, however, isn’t true. It may be somewhat understandable but not entirely reasonable to assume someone who is Chinese is from China which is what I’m trying to say.

      source
• realitista@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I think it’s a slightly different connotation. “China scientists” infers scientists residing in China while not presuming their ethnicity, while “Chinese scientists” implies their ethnicity but not their location.

  source

  • essteeyou@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    You literally never hear “America scientists” even if some of them might be from another country. Same with every single other country I can think of, except China.

    source

    • realitista@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      US scientists works in the same way.

      source
• liquidparasyte@pawb.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Real talk, why is discussion around people and subjects in China so fucking weird?

  If it’s not referring to the entire population when it only applies to the government or a subset of them as a global “the Chinese” or doing silly shit like “China scientists” everyone’s grammatical skills suddenly tank when even broaching a topic even tangential to the PRC.

  source
• Etienne_Dahu@jlai.lu ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  No, it’s people who study fine tableware.

  source
• Lemminary@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Me stutter? No think so!

  Image

  source

  • muhyb@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Him legend.

    source
• Mooseford@lemmy.today ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  No they are people who study the China Science.

  source
• DasSkelett@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Seriously, for me a “China scientist” is someone doing research on China, like a space scientist would do research on astronomy and similar. But I’m not a native English speaker, so, idk

  source

  • simplejack@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Someone doing research on China is a chiologist.

    Same as someone doing research on biology is a biologist.

    source

    • hazl@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Biology -> biolog -> biologist

      China -> chin -> chinist?

      source
  • realitista@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    The wording of the headline would be different if it were trying to convey that.

    source