Yes, this is closer to what I got in mind. I don’t use Bluesky but it seems like a good idea.
What I mean exactly was some way to build a view, or a portal, of the fediverse content when we substrate what we don’t like rather than adding it. It may take the form of label or another form. I may take a form of something close to a community or a feed throught which people browsing may get rid of content that doesn’t match the view of the "portal they are surfing on.
I don’t think @Snoopy@piefed.social it has to be unique. Just like we have multiple !aww community we could have a !nodowner !positivity !nonegativity portals all living along each other present each a slightly different view of the fediverse.
Snoopy@piefed.social 1 week ago
Didn't know that blsky has such feature. Very interesting idea thank for sharing :)
So that mean we could decide some option per label like this :
- gore > text only, remove picture
- nudity > do nothing
- porn > hide
- positive > promote
Or even set up the threehold :
- gore > hide if 10 users voted
As for the crowdsource verification, that may join my idea for a mediation team where they browse, class content.
I'm activating your bell since i'm curious of bluesky experience too. :)
JayGray91@lemmy.zip 6 days ago
When bluesky blew up last year almost instantly people made block lists, curated feeds list, etc of the sort. All built in. As much shit bluesky is getting for their wrongdoings, they did make very useful good things too.