Comment on Is there an easy way to create blocklist of post or comment for other people?

Snoopy@piefed.social ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• pseudo@jlai.lu ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  A wrote another comment but I couldn’t ping you somehow 👇

  source

  • Snoopy@piefed.social ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    It worked ? I received a notification just few minute ago : someone mentionned you. ;)

    source
• rimu@piefed.social ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  This idea is quite similar to what Bluesky is doing, with "Labels" https://docs.bsky.app/docs/advanced-guides/moderation.

  We'd need some way to crowdsource the verification and validity of the labels so people can't just put low-quality or abusive labels everywhere.

  It could potentially reduce the amount of work moderators need to do because spam would be labelled as such by anyone and if a few others also label it the same then it would reach a threshold where the label becomes active.

  Does anyone have experience with this way of moderating content on Bluesky? How well does it work in practice?

  source

  • pseudo@jlai.lu ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Yes, this is closer to what I got in mind. I don’t use Bluesky but it seems like a good idea.
    What I mean exactly was some way to build a view, or a portal, of the fediverse content when we substrate what we don’t like rather than adding it. It may take the form of label or another form. I may take a form of something close to a community or a feed throught which people browsing may get rid of content that doesn’t match the view of the "portal they are surfing on.

    I don’t think @Snoopy@piefed.social it has to be unique. Just like we have multiple !aww community we could have a !nodowner !positivity !nonegativity portals all living along each other present each a slightly different view of the fediverse.

    source

    • Snoopy@piefed.social ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Thank interesting, it's hard to imagine something different...

      I'm affraid people wouldn't understand and call it a bug whereas its just users culture and taste. 😅 but thank for sharimg this idea, it's very interestting :3

      source
  • Snoopy@piefed.social ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Didn't know that blsky has such feature. Very interesting idea thank for sharing :)

    So that mean we could decide some option per label like this :
    - gore > text only, remove picture
    - nudity > do nothing
    - porn > hide
    - positive > promote
    Or even set up the threehold :
    - gore > hide if 10 users voted

    As for the crowdsource verification, that may join my idea for a mediation team where they browse, class content.

    I'm activating your bell since i'm curious of bluesky experience too. :)

    source

    • JayGray91@lemmy.zip ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      When bluesky blew up last year almost instantly people made block lists, curated feeds list, etc of the sort. All built in. As much shit bluesky is getting for their wrongdoings, they did make very useful good things too.

      source