Comment on Python Performance: Why 'if not list' is 2x Faster Than Using len()

sirber@lemmy.ca ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• jj4211@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  else: # not my list, it is ourlist

  source
• gargolito@lemm.ee ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Python likes giving lists.

  source
• JasonDJ@lemmy.zip ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  if isinstance(mylist, list) and not mylist

  Problem solved.

  Or if not mylist # check if list is empty

  source

  • sirber@lemmy.ca ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I think you missed the joke 😅

    source

    • PattyMcB@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I thought it was funny!

      source
  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    You’re checking if mylist is falsey. Sometimes that’s the same as checking if it’s empty, if it’s actually a list, but that’s not guaranteed.

    source

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Doesn’t Python treat all empty iterables as false tho? This isn’t unique to python, is it? (though I’m not a programmer…just a dude who writes scripts every now and then)

      source

      • BlackRoseAmongThorns@slrpnk.net ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Not really, generators have weird truthiness, i don’t remember if they evaluate to true or false, but they cannot be checked for emptiness so they default to either always true or always false.

        source
      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        My point is that the second statement you presented can have the effect of evaluating emptiness of a Sequence (note: distinct from an Iterable), but that only holds true if the target of the conditional IS a sequence. I’m underlining the semantic difference that was elided as a result of falsey evaluation.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Telemetry

  source