This is also global, not even US data; iPhones are phenomenally more popular over there than anywhere else as far as I know. This is also one of the reasons some seriously begin to believe Android would be a “poor man’s phone”.
They’re more often subsidized by carriers here (in the US), too. I didn’t really want* an iPhone, but $400 new for a Plus, with a plan discount, just makes an Android set not worth it.
dryfter@lemm.ee 1 month ago
images
Source: forbes.com/…/global-top-10-best-selling-smartphon…
Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 1 month ago
This is also global, not even US data; iPhones are phenomenally more popular over there than anywhere else as far as I know. This is also one of the reasons some seriously begin to believe Android would be a “poor man’s phone”.
brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 month ago
They’re more often subsidized by carriers here (in the US), too. I didn’t really want* an iPhone, but $400 new for a Plus, with a plan discount, just makes an Android set not worth it.
Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
At that point I would start questioning why that particular phone is subsidized so much. Seems sus.
Ilandar@lemm.ee 1 month ago
It gets even worse if you separate users by age groups. Younger people overwhelmingly go for iPhones.
Psythik@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Yes but when it comes to OS share, Android completely dominates.