Comment

Comment on At least Quark had some integrity.

“Hey, bigots say this and it makes people sound like bigots when they say it”

“I used that word correctly and was told that it made me sound like a bigot. Maybe think about that?”

Cool, maybe get mad at the bigots who ruined the word for people rather than the people saying the word was ruined by bigots.

It’s like when people get mad at the r-slur being a slur now. Like, no, it was always intended as an insult based on medical language. It was always going to become a slur.

Now people are using the word female to both alienate and other women in their language and to “sound smarter” when showing bigotry. Also, you were probably told to not say it because they knew you were better than the assholes who say it in a demeaning way. Maybe… think about that?

source

Sort:hotnew top

Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
How about we just stop letting bigots have every fucking word and don’t assume negative qualities about people from an insignificant distinction, cultures are different and just assuming someone is a bigot because they used the word female in a proper context is absolutely idiotic and counter productive to actually fighting real bigotry

source
- chuckleslord@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  Never assumed this person was a bigot. The point being made is that “female” is now a dog whistle word for the alt-right. Dog whistles by themselves aren’t proof that someone is a bigot, but they are still words associated with bigotry.
  
  You can’t control what words become dog-whistles (Jean-Paul Sartre quote “But they(anti-semites) are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words”) but you can acknowledge that they ARE dog whistles without it being some moral failing to point it out.
  
  source
  - Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    I am talking more generally, not just you in this instance.
    
    We shouldn’t keep seeding ground to fascists over which words are “theirs” a simple and inconsequential example is Pepe the frog, there is nothing inherently racist about it and there are hordes of wholesome pepe memes, but someone decided that because it also gets coopted by fascists and racists that now pepe is actually a symbol for racism.
    
    This is idiotic that we are HANDING bad actors the right to own words and ideas by self policing.
    
    source
    chuckleslord@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    I don’t disagree, but I don’t see how you can do that. Well, I kind of do, that’s by “taking the word back”, poisoning the meaning of the word or its association so that hateful people won’t want to be associated with it. I know it’s definitely not shaming people for calling out that it’s a dog whistle. Because, again, that puts the moral failing on the person calling it out rather than the people who gave it the negative association to begin with.
    
    That quickly becomes “ugh, these fucking SJWs policing everyone’s speech” instead of “ugh, these fucking losers ruining perfectly good words with their hatred”, which it should be.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
Skullgrid@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

Cool, maybe get mad at the bigots who ruined the word for people rather than the people saying the word was ruined by bigots.

A scorpion wants to cross a river but cannot swim, so it asks a frog to carry it across. The frog hesitates, afraid that the scorpion might sting it, but the scorpion promises not to, pointing out that it would drown if it killed the frog in the middle of the river. The frog considers this argument sensible and agrees to transport the scorpion. Midway across the river, the scorpion stings the frog anyway, dooming them both. The dying frog asks the scorpion why it stung despite knowing the consequence, to which the scorpion replies: “I am sorry, but I couldn’t help myself. It’s my character.”

good luck getting the bigots to change.

source
- chuckleslord@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  Who said anything about getting them to change? Getting mad at people because the word changed instead of getting mad at the people who changed the word is my point. There’s a reason why that word was targeted as a dog whistle, but it is still a dog whistle now and acknowledging that it is isn’t some moral wrong.
  
  source