These fatalities are a Tesla business advantage. Every one is a data point they can use to program their self-driving intelligence. No one has killed as many as Tesla, so no one knows more about what kills people than Tesla. We don’t have to turn this into a bad thing just because they’re killing people /s
Comment on Self-Driving Teslas Are Fatally Striking Motorcyclists More Than Any Other Brand: New Analysis
captainastronaut@seattlelunarsociety.org 3 weeks ago
Tesla self driving is never going to work well enough without sensors - cameras are not enough. It’s fundamentally dangerous and should not be driving unsupervised (or maybe at all).
scarabic@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Ledericas@lemm.ee 3 weeks ago
they originally had lidar, or radar, but musk had them disabled in the older models.
NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
They had radar. Tesla has never had lidar, but they do use lidar to ground truth their camera depth / velocity calculations.
ascense@lemm.ee 3 weeks ago
Most frustrating thing is, as far as I can tell, Tesla doesn’t even have binocular vision, which makes all the claims about humans being able to drive with vision only even more blatantly stupid. At least humans have depth perception. And supposedly their goal is to outperform humans?
TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Tesla’s argument of “well human eyes are like cameras therefore we shouldn’t use LiDAR” is so fucking dumb.
Human eyes have good depth perception and absolutely exceptional dynamic range and focusing ability. They also happen to be linked up to a rapid and highly efficient super computer far outclassing anything that humanity has ever devised, certainly more so than any computer added to a car.
And even with all those advantages humans have, we still crash from time to time and make smaller mistakes regularly.
NABDad@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
A neural network that has been in development for 650 million years.
explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Ok, maybe project managers are good for something.