Comment on GenAI website goes dark after explicit fakes exposed

• reseller_pledge609@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Yes, but how is the AI making the images or videos? It has to be trained on SOMETHING.

  So, regardless of direct harm or not, harm is done at some point in the process and it needs to be stopped before it slips and gets worse because people “get used to” it.

  source

  • Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Ai can combine two things. It can train on completely normal pictures of children, and it can train on completely normal porn, and then it can put those together.

    This is the same reason it can do something like Godzilla with Sailor Moon’s hair, not because it trained on images of Godzilla with Sailor Moon’s hair, but because it can combine those two separate things.

    source

    • reseller_pledge609@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Fair enough. I still think it shouldn’t be allowed though.

      source

      • figjam@midwest.social ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Why? Not pressing but just curious what the logic is

        source
    • RightEdofer@lemmy.ca ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Only the real things are actual humans who have likely not consented to ever being in this database at all let alone having parts of their likeness being used for this horrific shit. There is no moral argument for this garbage:

      source

      • jaschen@lemm.ee ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Technically speaking, if you post images of your child on social media, you have consented. If you never uploaded an image of your child online, you never need to worry.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I wouldn’t think it needs to have child porn in the training data to be able to generate it. It has porn as the data, it knows what kids look like, merge the two. I think that works for anything AI knows about, make this resemble this.

    source

    • reseller_pledge609@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      That’s fair, but I still think it shouldn’t be accepted or allowed.

      source

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        It seems pretty understandable that companies wouldn’t allow it, it’s more that if it is illegal (like in some places) then that gets into really sketchy territory imo.

        source
      • jaschen@lemm.ee ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        I agree it shouldn’t be accepted, but I disagree on being allowed. I think it should be allowed because it doesn’t hurt anyone.

        source
  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    It has to be trained on SOMETHING.

    Old cp?

    needs to be stopped before it slips and gets worse because people “get used to” it.

    Ah, right, almost finally forgot the killer games rhetoric.

    source

    • reseller_pledge609@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      I also don’t agree with the killer games thing, but humans are very adaptable as a species.

      Normally that’s a good thing, but in a case like this exposure to something shocking or upsetting can make it less shocking or upsetting over time (obviously not in every case). So, if AI is being used for something like this and being reported on isn’t it possible that people might slowly get desensitized to it over time?

      source

      • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        But what if confirmed pedophiles are less likely to commit a crime if they have access to respective porn? Even better then, if it can be AI generated, no?

        source

        • -> View More Comments