Shouldn’t’t need it. Instead I say the push should be that any AI trained on public resources must remain public and any derivative of that model also must remain publicly available.
Shouldn’t’t need it. Instead I say the push should be that any AI trained on public resources must remain public and any derivative of that model also must remain publicly available.
echodot@feddit.uk 1 month ago
Yes I agree. But copyrighted material isn’t a public resource.
Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I don’t care about copyrights.
xthexder@l.sw0.com 1 month ago
Better content?
Lol
Lmao even.
Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Absolutely. The Internet pre monetization was way better than anything today.
Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Well, that’s one take I guess… Not a good one, but one none the less…
echodot@feddit.uk 1 month ago
If we didn’t have copyright then people wouldn’t be able to justify putting effort into creating content because they wouldn’t be guaranteed financial compensation for the time and effort they put in.
Everything costs money, If I’m writing a novel I still have to pay the bills I still have to buy groceries I still have to pay for water and electricity I need to be compensated for my time.
ayaya@lemdro.id 1 month ago
The irony of saying this on Lemmy. Lemmy is piece of software developed and distributed for free to people who host it for free. If somebody truly wants to make something they will create it even without profit incentive.
Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I have needs and wants as well. I hope you get paid well. But when you stand in the path of something I think to be progress then we conflict.
vala@lemmy.world 1 month ago
You are literally typing on Lemmy. How much did you pay to use this? See any ads around?
Open souce devs would strongly disagree with this.