Shouldn’t’t need it. Instead I say the push should be that any AI trained on public resources must remain public and any derivative of that model also must remain publicly available.
If we didn’t have copyright then people wouldn’t be able to justify putting effort into creating content because they wouldn’t be guaranteed financial compensation for the time and effort they put in.
Everything costs money, If I’m writing a novel I still have to pay the bills I still have to buy groceries I still have to pay for water and electricity I need to be compensated for my time.
Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Shouldn’t’t need it. Instead I say the push should be that any AI trained on public resources must remain public and any derivative of that model also must remain publicly available.
echodot@feddit.uk 1 month ago
Yes I agree. But copyrighted material isn’t a public resource.
Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I don’t care about copyrights.
xthexder@l.sw0.com 1 month ago
Better content?
Lol
Lmao even.
Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Well, that’s one take I guess… Not a good one, but one none the less…
echodot@feddit.uk 1 month ago
If we didn’t have copyright then people wouldn’t be able to justify putting effort into creating content because they wouldn’t be guaranteed financial compensation for the time and effort they put in.
Everything costs money, If I’m writing a novel I still have to pay the bills I still have to buy groceries I still have to pay for water and electricity I need to be compensated for my time.