Like all other AI and all the copyright in the world. Shareholders are ok with. Copyright for me, not for you. Pirates were the bad guys. These are the saviours we deserve.
Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 4 weeks ago
So was it trained on his work without his approval?
devfuuu@lemmy.world [bot] 4 weeks ago
mechoman444@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
If you listen to the red hot chili peppers or watch a marvel movie or look at a DC comic and then go and make a song, movie, or painting inspired by the style of a certain creator that does not mean you have somehow violated those creators copyright. You don’t owe them any money because you took inspiration.
AI training on publicly available data does not infringe on copyright even if that data is somehow copyrighted.
And I know that many people on these kinds of platforms don’t like to hear this but the benefits of AI outweighs any potential legal issues copyright might entail.
Moreover, and I keep pointing this out over and over, you can’t have the same information free for individuals to use and have it paid for at the same time for corporations. You have to decide if you want that information free for all or for none.
Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 4 weeks ago
Who’s watching marvel movies for free, legally? Who’s listening to RHCP’s entire discography for free, legally?
mechoman444@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
No one is. That’s exactly the point.
Llms aren’t recreating copyrighted works. They’re drawing inspiration if you will. No copyright is being infringed.
woelkchen@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Seems this is legal now. Keep this in mind, when the next video game decompilation project comes along because that’s also machine-generated material based on copyrighted released media. That must be equally as legal now.
thickertoofan@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
Everything was. Is …
Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Hopefully. It makes cool pictures.
Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 4 weeks ago
I said without, I wouldn’t believe they got his approval…
Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Shouldn’t’t need it. Instead I say the push should be that any AI trained on public resources must remain public and any derivative of that model also must remain publicly available.
echodot@feddit.uk 4 weeks ago
Yes I agree. But copyrighted material isn’t a public resource.
undeffeined@lemmy.ml 4 weeks ago
That should be the headline. Assuming it was done without consent, which lets face it, it most likely was.
buddascrayon@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
The way Altman whines about how much he should be allowed to steal people’s work to feed his bottom line, I have no doubt whatsoever that this is the case.
andros_rex@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Altman doesn’t seemed to be concerned with consent in general.
Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 4 weeks ago
These people from the Silicon Valley see themselves as the saviours of mankind (look up Longtermism in Silicon Valley). Within their structure of believe anything is within reason as long as it serves the greater good. That includes anything from obviously breaking the law to outright genocide, which we see in action right now.
Of course since their moral code is already eroded to its core there are no boundaries, like “I shouldn’t molest other people”…
dan69@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Since when do rich billionaires care about consent??