Comment on A Reddit moderation tool is flagging ‘Luigi’ as potentially violent content

angleangel@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

• Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  You give it to whoever asks for it or you never get another source again.

  source

  • angleangel@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    This isn’t a “source”. This is a corporate spokesperson

    source

    • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Was this corporate spokesperson authorized to talk to this outlet about this topic? Just because they’re a spokesperson doesn’t mean they can talk freely.

      source

      • angleangel@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Yes, that’s what a spokesperson is. Did you read the article? If it was a leak that would have been stated.

        source
    • Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      …its both

      source
    • subignition@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Even though it's a corporate spokesperson, they wouldn't have requested anonymity if they were allowed to talk about it...

      source

      • roguetrick@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Untrue. Reddit employees doing what their bosses tell them to are justifiably afraid of the blowback. Reminds me of the directive to not wear Reddit branding with the 3rd party app thing These folks don’t want targets on their back.

        source
    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      In journalism, a source is a person, publication, or knowledge of other record or document that gives timely information. Outside journalism, sources are sometimes known as “news sources”. Examples of sources include official records, publications or broadcasts, officials in government or business, organizations or corporations, witnesses of crime, accidents or other events, and people involved with or affected by a news event or issue.

      source
  • r8KNzcU8TzCroexsE2xbWC@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    That’s not what they do according to their own ethics statement

    www.theverge.com/ethics-statement

    source

    • Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      I’m not reading that. What are you saying?

      source

      • multiplewolves@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Take the link and scroll down to the section titled “ON BACKGROUND”

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• IronJess@lemmy.today ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  The anti evil operations team has done this in the past.

  source

  • angleangel@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    What the fuck is “the anti evil operations team”? That sounds like corpospeak for a team that does deeply evil shit

    source
• ivanafterall@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Actually, yeah. Otherwise, you fuck up whistleblowing. They could be in the position, realize what’s happening is wrong, be documenting it, trying to get out, etc…

  source

  • angleangel@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Are you seriously suggesting there is no way to grant whistleblowers anonymity without granting it to corporate spokespeople providing statements on behalf of the company? You’re a fucking idiot

    source