Youtube started when hosting video’s was way easier. The files where smaller, the bandwidth of most people wasn’t that great either. Storage was more expensive though.
These days everybody wants 4K footage and everybody was 100-1000+ mbps internet and we have 4K screens so we can also watch it.
The competitors who host it are either paid up front or porn sites. Because there is no real way to start up a competitor to YouTube. I decided to accept that and I have RSSfeeds of all the creators I like to watch so I bypass the algorithm
superminerJG@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Let’s just say, unless YouTube crosses people’s bottom lines and there’s an alternative being actively advertised, people won’t move.
Otherwise, they push that bottom line further.
kalleboo@lemmy.world 2 days ago
The lack of alternatives where creators actually get paid for people watching their videos is the biggest problem.
FrostyPolicy@suppo.fi 2 days ago
Even youtube doesn’t pay the creators that much. Lois Rossman in a recent video showed some of his video in YT that had > 200k views generated ~100 $ of income.
FrostyPolicy@suppo.fi 2 days ago
On a related note. Why would creators add sponsored segments/other sponsoring/patreon etc if YT pays them enough?
spoiler
YT doesn’t pay them enough. Unless your some kind of super star.
kalleboo@lemmy.world 2 days ago
And that’s probably what will kill them as payouts get worse and worse making other platforms more attractive as you’re not losing as much. A lot of YouTubers I follow seem to becoming more and more reliant on Patreon as ad revenue goes down.
FrostyPolicy@suppo.fi 2 days ago
Nebula pays creator, and you pay to Nebula.
Petter1@lemm.ee 2 days ago
I have nebula, but still pay also for YT subscriptions
Rhoeri@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Agreed. Seems there no floor to what people will put up with from them. I can’t understand it. I’ve tried products and services I found that I absolutely hated. I don’t have those products or services anymore.
It’s pretty easy to not do something.