Comment on brains!

• Eheran@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  You mean the median? :3

  source
• abbadon420@lemm.ee ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  If we’re talking about IQ, than no. An IQ between 85 and 115 is considered average. This entails 68% of the population. So, only 32% of people are not average and only 16% are below average.

  source
• FinalRemix@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  It can’t be that many.

  source

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    It’s not. I assure you there are far more outliers on the low end.

    source

    • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      I endeavour to be as stupid as possible so more people can be above average.

      source

      • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        America thanks you for your service.

        source
    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      But I’m sure there are more people with 200+ IQ than with <0.

      source

      • blandfordforever@lemm.ee ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        I understand that you’re saying there are more incredible geniuses than full on retards.

        However, IQ scores are a normal distribution with an arbitrarily defined mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15.

        So, IQ scores of 0 or 200 are both 6.6 standard deviations from the mean. If IQ is truly a normal distribution, you’d expect the number of people with IQ scores <= 0 and the number with scores >= 200, to be exactly the same, simply because this is how the scores are defined.

        If you try to look up what proportion of the population falls outside 6.6 standard deviations, the z-tables don’t go out this far. It’s essentially 0%

        source