Comment on Twitter is throttling traffic to websites Elon dislikes
teft@startrek.website 1 year ago
Wait, I was told net neutrality wasn’t needed.
Comment on Twitter is throttling traffic to websites Elon dislikes
teft@startrek.website 1 year ago
Wait, I was told net neutrality wasn’t needed.
elscallr@lemmy.world 1 year ago
This has nothing to do with net neutrality. Either you didn’t read the article, you didn’t understand what you read, or you don’t understand what net neutrality means.
To your credit, the use of “throttles” in the headline is (likely intentionally) deceptive. It’s the wrong term entirely. What Xitter did was make their own servers wait ~5 seconds before serving an http redirect.
teft@startrek.website 1 year ago
Sounds exactly like he is disregarding net neutrality to me.
Cubes@lemm.ee 1 year ago
This is the key here, though. Twitter isn’t an ISP, they’re just making it more annoying when navigating from their site to elsewhere.
KevonLooney@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Which is hilarious. This will only hurt them.
People will just think Twitter is slow. Obviously Threads or NY Times will work normally when people are on those sites.
teft@startrek.website 1 year ago
Net neutrality is the concept of an open, equal internet for everyone, regardless of device, application or platform used and content consumed. You can argue semantics all day but twitter slowing traffic or redirects to certain other websites is violation of net neutrality if not the letter of the definition then for sure the spirit of it.
PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
He’s like the asshole bakers who won’t make the cake for the gay wedding. Or he’ll do it eventually but whine about it the entire time and it’ll arrive late and burnt.
elscallr@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I’ve got no problem baking anyone a cake, but you’re right it’ll be late and burnt. I can’t bake for shit.
But your assumption that I wouldn’t force anyone to bake that cake, you’re absolutely right.
jimmux@programming.dev 1 year ago
While still expecting to get paid.
elscallr@lemmy.world 1 year ago
That’s because you don’t know what an “internet service provider” is. Twitter is not one.
brygphilomena@lemmy.world 1 year ago
It definitely draws direct parallels to net neutrality. It also shows the consolidation of web services into the hands of a few large corporations and the impact it has on the internet.
Im sure Twitter would argue that it’s not throttling, they don’t limit the speed in any way. But it does make it appear to end users as if the web site is loading slower.
It would be interesting if these sites could see a noticeable drop in traffic during the period Twitter was imposing delays on the redirect. If so, thats potential lost revenue and a basis for a lawsuit.