Never give these rich assholes credit
unless there is an airtight contract for payment.
just_another_person@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Never give these rich assholes credit unless there is an airtight contract for payment.
JoMiran@lemmy.ml 2 days ago
pandapoo@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
Cash on delivery is extremely rare in the business world. Well I have no doubt many of Twitter’s vendors have switched to COD, that is not the norm.
These types of relationships typically work on anywhere from 30 to 90 day terms, depending on the vendor, client, and their history.
mipadaitu@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Payment up front, in non negotiable bearer bonds.
Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 2 days ago
There is no such thing as an airtight contract when dealing with Musk. He simply ignores it until you sue.
billiam0202@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Same thing as Trump.
Doesn’t matter how perfect your contract is, as long as they can afford to fight the lawsuit longer than you you’re gonna lose.
You’d think people would learn to not contract with these assholes at all.
theneverfox@pawb.social 2 days ago
You just have to work in legal costs to anything you do. Call it an asshole tax
helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 days ago
Or you just…stop providing the service?
kautau@lemmy.world 2 days ago
So basically they were got bespoke servers that are great for Twitter, custom designed, and definitely aren’t easy to just resell elsewhere, so because Twitter isn’t paying they’re IT company is eating the loss right now
Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 2 days ago
The article sounds to me like they were selling hardware, not providing a service.
Checking their website confirms this is what they usually offer.