Comment

Comment on If Jesus can turn water into wine, but wine is still mostly made of water, can Jesus apply his powers recursively and create more and more concentrated wine?

<- View Parent

scarabic@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

Since literally everyone could be described as a believer in the past that’s not what I meant. We started with the word “theologian” and yes I assume any reasonable definition of that word is going to have high, high overlap with the clergy, with perhaps some exceptions.

Newton was basically an astrologer.

You lost me, friend. I’m not even sure we can agree to disagree at this point. I’m just going to back away slowly…

source

Sort:hotnew top

dwindling7373@feddit.it ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
You can run but you cannot hide: wikiless.org/wiki/Isaac_Newton's_occult_studies?l…

And no, the people I mentioned moved theology in different directions, they actually did study and engaged with it.

#sorrynotsorry

source
- scarabic@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  When your source throws a browser security warning, you automatically lose.
  
  source
  - dwindling7373@feddit.it ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    I can’t lose or win this is not a fight.
    
    Here you go, a different instance. It’s just wikipedia BTW: wiki.froth.zone/…/Isaac_Newton's_occult_studies?l…
    
    source