Comment on Mozilla launches privacy friendly AI addon called "Orbit"

cloudless@lemmy.cafe ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

• n2burns@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Has Mozilla done sometime to deserve this skepticism? They were founded on open-source and AFAIK have continued to support open-source. Mozilla is far from a perfect organization, but if this project was a success I think it would be out of character for them to keep it closed-source.

  source

  • toothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    then why make it closed source to begin with?

    source

    • vinnymac@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Believe it or not but it requires resources to open source an internal product, especially one that may have been an experiment that some small team was able to convince leadership could become useful to the masses.

      React.js at Facebook is a good example of this. It took a lot of effort to externalize and open source React, and tbh the codebase is still kind of garbage when it comes to contributions from those unfamiliar with its intricacies.

      source

      • toothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        but… you dont have to accept contributions? you can just make it open source and tidy it up at the same time?

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • CluckN@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      It’s provocative it gets the people going.

      source
  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Eh, skepticism should be the default.

    But I agree with you, nothing they’ve done is inherently bad, though they’ve done some abysmally stupid things in the way they handle them.

    But I also really wish they’d stop fucking around with half-assed things like this and focus on core utilities.

    source

    • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      What core utilities does Firefox need that it doesn’t have? Honest question. I’ve been using it over a decade and never had it fail to do something I asked it to, and I’m a little out of the loop on the web browser development news cycle beyond the recent wave of Google Bad.

      source

      • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Mozilla has firefox and thunderbird. They’re the two core utilities. The vpn attempt, the Mastodon server, that kind of stuff is fluff.

        I may be using the wrong terminology? It was an offhand comment and that’s the word that I picked out of my head, it might mean something different to a developer, I dunno.

        But Mozilla, if you ignore what Google pays them, is not exactly a high profit endeavour, and we don’t want it to be. So having what funds they have focused onto the things that matter is what I’d prefer they do. Mind you, if the vpn pulls enough in to generate funds rather than cost them, that’s great.

        source
  • cloudless@lemmy.cafe ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Pocket.

    source

    • n2burns@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      That’s a pretty good answer. I knew Mozilla had bought it, and were operating it as an independent subsidiary. I didn’t know they promised to open-source it over 7 years ago.

      source
  • zecg@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Has Mozilla done sometime to deserve this skepticism?

    Yes, their “privacy friendly ad measurement” that’s opt out is a faux pas that I just can’t forgive. I used to donate to the fuckers.

    source

    • zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      That feature (more) they’ve been getting all that negative press over for the past two days is an absolutely gigantic non-issue. Like most anti-Mozilla stories end up being.

      The whole thing is an experimental feature intended to replace the current privacy nightmare that is cross-site tracking cookies. As-implemented it’s a way for advertisers to figure out things like “How many people who went to our site and purchased this product saw this ad we placed on another site?”, but done in such a way that neither the website with the ad, nor the website with the product, nor Mozilla itself knows what any one specific user was doing.

      There are definitely things that can be said about this feature, like “Fuck ad companies, it should be off by default” (my personal take). But the feature itself has virtually no privacy consequences whatsoever for anybody, and Mozilla is at least trying to build a system that would legitimately improve the privacy situation on the internet created by companies like Google.

      source

      • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        I don’t think that whether it has a privacy impact even matters. What matters is how it demonstrates Mozilla’s attitude towards user consent.

        source
    • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      It does not affect you if you use an adblocker, this feature is meant to allow websites to have ad analytics without tracking.

      source

      • zecg@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        User JohnFen on ycombinator’s hacker news said it nicely and I’m lazy, so:

        PPA means that my browser is doing the spying instead of a third party directly. That’s certainly a privacy improvement, but I don’t consider it sufficient.

        “Sufficiently private” is a subjective call. I don’t want to be spied on. Whether or not there are technological “privacy preserving” features baked into it doesn’t alter that fundamental fact.

        All that said, this isn’t a bad enough move to get me to stop using Firefox, as long as I can keep it disabled. It does mean that I have to view Firefox with suspicion, though. I can’t consider the browser to be my “user agent” anymore.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Firefox is sustained by google who needs artificial competitions to not be labeled a monopoly.

    Its still the best browser i can think off that isn’t chromium but i would recommend staying skeptical.

    source

    • Tobberone@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Well, that’s been the basis for some other products. AMD and Intel comes to mind😊 They both have IP the other need and historically Intel has been the dominant one, but now the tables have turned somewhat.

      source
  • dantheclamman@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    They said they’d open source Pocket and they didn’t. In fact, they’ve simply allowed it to rot and just removed features. So here I think the skepticism is warranted.

    source
  • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    This is enough to warrant scepticism for me: lemmy.ml/post/20683744

    source