Comment on Secret calculator hack brings ChatGPT to the TI-84, enabling easy cheating

• Khanzarate@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I did the same thing. It was allowed in general, with the correct thought, “if you can code it yourself, you know the content”

  I had another “program” that would fail to run but that’s because I wrote notes into it. Doubt that was allowed.

  source

  • SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Here in NZ they do a factory reset on your calculator at the start of every exam.

    source

    • piecat@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Oh I would have been so pissed. I was programming on my calculator 24/7 instead of my classes.

      I wrote a sudoku “editor”

      I put that in quotes because I had a grid that could be navigated, arrows moved, storing the numbers, had number entry down, and then I learned the hard way what p vs np is.

      source
    • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      They did that here too, but students would use a cheat program that made it look like teachers were resetting it, but really the memory was safe

      source

      • SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        I don’t remember if they fully closed the loopholes, but there are inputs that programs cannot catch unless you actually replace the OS.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • thejml@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    I did that but made it return success before it got to the notes. You had to scroll to get to the notes, but it looked innocuous before that.

    source
  • UNY0N@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Oh god I remember doing that too. Those “programs” were the best. I even mad sure to make the code long, so that even if someone thought to take a look at the code they would have to scroll for a while to find the notes.

    source
• linearchaos@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I could never remember the formula to calculate compound interest.

  But I had no trouble writing a for loop.

  source

  • VintageGenious@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    K•(1+r)^n

    source

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      I would just rebuild something in my head like this every time.

      While i < n; k=k+(k*r); i++;

      You’d think I could remember k(1+r)^n but when you posted, it looked as alien as it felt decades ago.

      source

      • VintageGenious@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        The use of for makes sense.

        k=0; for (i=0; i<n; i++) k=k+f(i); is the same as k=\sum_{i=0}^{n-1} f(i)

        and

        k=1; for (i=0; i<n; i++) k=k*f(i); is the same as k=\prod_{i=0}^{n-1} f(i)

        In our case, f(i)=1+r and k=1; for (i=0; i<n; i++) k*(1+r); is the same as k=\prod_{i=0}^{n-1} (1+r) = (1+r)^n

        All of that just to say that exponentiation is an iteration of multiplication, the same way that multiplication is an iteration of addition

        source
  • BluesF@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    What always annoyed me was having to draw charts by hand. Just let me put the data in a computer for god’s sake, the rest of the working is there… I did actually write a python function for one of my assignments which was fine, but they told me not to do it for the exam.

    source
• TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I made one to decompose polynomials it was very good because it showed all the steps it was literally just copy what’s on the calc to the page

  source
• ShunkW@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  So you didn’t get the transfer cable with your calculator? Smells fishy

  source

  • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Issued by the school; I never owned it.

    source
  • TriflingToad@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    you can code directly on the device, it’s just a PAIN to do compared to moving the files over

    source

    • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Can confirm, as someone who spent multiple study halls trying to program a top down shooter on his calculator

      source