Comment on Protection zones around abortion clinics in place by October

• Flax_vert@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  What I don’t understand is why it’s legal to kill your child before it’s born but not after. It doesn’t make sense.

  source

  • wren@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    If you deny women access to abortion related healthcare, they die. Abortion bans ruin lives, and if you really have to protest abortions (which you shouldn’t), direct your attention towards politicians, instead of harassing women who need healthcare and are already having a horrible time.

    source

    • Flax_vert@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      The article you posted showed how a woman and her unborn children tragically died from a botched abortion. Her death had little to do with the abortion ban. In fact, if abortion was banned nationally, her life would have been saved.

      source
  • GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    The great thing is though, it’s completely up to you to choose: If you want to carry a child to term, and have the requisite equipment, you can do so.
    If someone else doesn’t want to, that’s their decision too.

    source

    • Flax_vert@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Carrying a child to term is the natural outcome most of the time, except from tragic miscarriages. If Abortion was truly autonomy, it wouldn’t require clinics

      source
  • FooBarrington@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Because it’s not yet a child. It has the potential to become one, but it isn’t yet. Seriously, you can’t be daft enough not to understand the difference.

    source

    • Flax_vert@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      So where is the line drawn? 1000050331

      source

      • scratchee@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        That’s exactly the answer given to you above - the line is murky and grey, there is no clear point that everyone agrees is the right point.

        In such a circumstance, the right answer is open to interpretation, and the right solution for a society is to accept that the best person to make that decision is the person involved.

        If you want my answer, it’s when brain cells develop enough to start looking like a functioning brain (somewhere around 16-20 weeks). Before that it’s just a brain dead mass of cells regardless of how it looks.

        Clearly you have a different moment, and that’s fine, but you don’t get to ignore that the issue is open to interpretation. Otoh, I admit that both sides are guilty of trying to railroad a “simple” interpretation as the only right answer, it’s always tempting to force a simple answer and declare the problem solved, it’s harder to let people decide for themselves what the right answer is, but that’s the right thing to do when we as a society cannot reach a consensus, and we certainly don’t seem to have a consensus on this one.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Cool. Your welcome to feel that way.

    But when you intimidate people who disagree with your flawed non scientific ideal of the start of life.

    You face restrictions on you right to gather near them.

    source

    • Flax_vert@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      It is a scientific fact that foetus are human lives - they react to things, have a heartbeat, can feel pain, etc. The anti-science ones are the ones trying to make science say something that agrees with their worldview so people don’t have to face the outcome of their actions.

      Just say you were convinced that foetus are human lives - would you still be in favour of abortion?

      source

      • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Cells react to things. Dose not mean it is an independent console being.

        If you can proove your moles meet the same standards. Would you still agree with removal.

        source

        • -> View More Comments