I’ve been questioning it since the day Mushk said “We don’t need fancy pants LiDAR, regular cameras are all you need!”
As if a safety critical system shouldn’t have backups or alternative sensors for verifying shit
Comment on Questions about the safety of Tesla's 'Full Self-Driving' system are growing
harrybo93@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Questions are growing? Haven’t they been out already for fucking years??
cm0002@lemmy.world 2 months ago
echodot@feddit.uk 2 months ago
Also things like adverse weather conditions exist, and I think sometimes the sun goes out.
Petter1@lemm.ee 2 months ago
Yes and because cams see so well in rain and fog 😅
dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 2 months ago
That, and every time I see video from one somehow the inbuilt cameras on a Tesla produce worse picture quality than a $30 Amazon dashcam. And why do they tint everything brown?
Passerby6497@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Yes growing. They were birthed years ago, and Elon has done his best to nurture them so they grow big and strong
dan1101@lemm.ee 2 months ago
Tesla keeps promising things are fixed in the next update, then the next update, and so on. I don’t think Tealas have the proper sensors to avoid collisions and their algorithms don’t think like an attentive driver does.
endofline@lemmy.ca 2 months ago
Everybody knows that tesla sacrificed lidar sensors with cameras because it was cheaper. Yes, lidar can do it easily
ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 2 months ago
It’s not seeing that’s the problem. It’s what to do with the information about what you see.
chakan2@lemmy.world 2 months ago
It’s both. Imagine being half blind flying a jet and you don’t understand what the instruments do.
That’s a typical Tesla engineer these days. (He’s fired the whole team at least twice now. The guys that are left are the most inept I desperately need a job engineers out there).