BB84
@BB84@mander.xyz
- Comment on OpenAI Says It's Scanning Users' ChatGPT Conversations and Reporting Content to the Police 2 weeks ago:
you missed one L. it’s !localllama@sh.itjust.works
- Comment on China cut itself off from the global internet on Wednesday 3 weeks ago:
maybe it’s a different crowd. or a different game. over here the cheaters are all 13 years old australians who think they’re master hacker.
- Comment on China cut itself off from the global internet on Wednesday 3 weeks ago:
More. I play in oceania and the cheaters are always english speakers.
- Comment on You are hotter 4 weeks ago:
If there is no way to transfer energy between two systems, then they can separately be in their own thermal equilibrium such that it makes non sense to compare their temperature.
- Comment on Proton’s Lumo AI chatbot: not end-to-end encrypted, not open source 1 month ago:
homomorphic encryption?
not there yet, of course, but it is conceptually possible
@wewbull@feddit.uk
- Submitted 1 month ago to technology@lemmy.zip | 0 comments
- Comment on YSK that "AI" in itself is highly unspecific term 1 month ago:
Do most humans understand what molecules are? How?
- Comment on [deleted] 2 months ago:
You asked it “who do you support” (i.e., “who does Grok support”). It knew that Grok was owned by Musk so it went and looked up who Musk supports.
As shown in simonwillison.net/2025/Jul/11/grok-musk/ , if you ask it “who should one support” then it no longer looks for Musk’s opinions. The answer is still hasbara, but that is only to be expected from an LLM trained in USA
- Comment on Why Americans Can’t Buy the World’s Best Electric Car 2 months ago:
If something is being so heavily subsidized, the correct market response is to buy as much as possible, and resell once the prices ramp up.
Setting up tariffs and complaining about subsidies? 100% not the “free market” response. It’s cope.
- Comment on We are not the same 2 months ago:
Incredible. But I must ask… was this written by the monster?
- Comment on Germany deems DeepSeek as illegal content after it is unable to address data security concerns, and asks Apple and Google to block it from their app stores 2 months ago:
lemmy.world/signup <-- link for your convenience 😊
or maybe www.reddit.com/register/ is more suitable. enjoy like-minded posters there!
- Comment on Germany deems DeepSeek as illegal content after it is unable to address data security concerns, and asks Apple and Google to block it from their app stores 2 months ago:
the distills are good for their sizes but not even close to being comparable to the full model in quality
- Comment on Germany deems DeepSeek as illegal content after it is unable to address data security concerns, and asks Apple and Google to block it from their app stores 2 months ago:
your comment is extremely lemmy dot world
why tf are you still on dbzer0
- Comment on Some of your AI prompts could cause 50 times more CO2 emissions than others 2 months ago:
Also true: When you do 0 AI prompts, they all cause the same amount of emissions, which is 999999999 gigajoules.
- Comment on I'm looking for an article showing that LLMs don't know how they work internally 3 months ago:
Can humans think?
- Comment on The ‘Profound’ Experience of Seeing a New Color 4 months ago:
- Comment on DeepSeek iOS app sends data unencrypted to ByteDance-controlled servers 7 months ago:
Data sent entirely in the clear occurs during the initial registration of the app, including:
- organization id
- the version of the software development kit used to create the app
- user OS version
- language selected in the configuration
Doesn’t like very important information. Anyway, if you care about privacy you should not be using the official app or API. Go on OpenRouter and use DeepSeek models served by other inference providers with better privacy policies.
- Comment on your mom falls significantly faster than g 10 months ago:
even light can stop following null geodesics because the curvature can be too big compared to the wavelength
Very interesting! How do you study something like this? Is it classical E&M in a curved space time, or do you need to do QED in curved space time?
Also, are there phenomena where this effect is significant? I’m assuming something like lensing is already captured very well by treating light as point particles?
- Comment on your mom falls significantly faster than g 10 months ago:
So if I have a spherically symmetric object in GR I can write the Schwarzschild metric that does not depend on the radial mass distribution. But once I add a second spherically symmetric object, the metric now depends on the mass distribution of both objects?
Your point about linearity is that if GR was linear, I could’ve instead add two Schwarzschild metrics together to get a new metric that depends only on each object’s total mass?
But even in a situation with one source, does the shell theorem work in GR? Say I put a infinitely light spherical shell around a black hole. Would it follow the same geodesic as a point particle?
- Comment on your mom falls significantly faster than g 10 months ago:
For the bowling ball, Newton’s shell theorem applies, right?
- Comment on your mom falls significantly faster than g 10 months ago:
Earth is in this case not an inertial reference frame. If you want to apply Newton’s second law you must go to an inertial reference frame. The 9.81m/s/s is relative to that frame, not to earth.
- Comment on your mom falls significantly faster than g 10 months ago:
That is one very impressive feather.
Restricting ourselves to feathers made by non-human animals
🤔🤔🤔
- Comment on your mom falls significantly faster than g 10 months ago:
the original title was “your mom false significantly faster than g”
- Comment on your mom falls significantly faster than g 10 months ago:
Re your first point: I was imagining doing the two experiments separately. But even if you do them at the same time, as long as you don’t put the two objects right on top of each other, the earth’s acceleration would still be slanted toward the ball, making the ball hit the ground very very slightly sooner.
Re your second point: The object would be accelerating in the direction of earth. The 9.81m/s/s is with respect to an reference frame (say the center of mass frame). The earth is also accelerating in the direction of the object at some acceleration with respect to the inertial reference frame.
- Comment on your mom falls significantly faster than g 10 months ago:
Nope. The argument only works if you conjured the bowling ball and feather out of
thin airvacuum. lemmy.world/comment/13237315 discusses what happens when the objects were lifted off earth. - Comment on your mom falls significantly faster than g 10 months ago:
I didn’t think about that! If the object was taken from earth then indeed the total acceleration between it and earth would be G M_total / r^2, regardless of the mass of the object.
- Comment on your mom falls significantly faster than g 10 months ago:
Okay how about now
- Comment on your mom falls significantly faster than g 10 months ago:
@WolfLink@sh.itjust.works and @theturtlemoves@hexbear.net are correct
- Comment on your mom falls significantly faster than g 10 months ago:
fixed it sorry
- Comment on your mom falls significantly faster than g 10 months ago:
I meant cross-section area, not surface area. Sorry. Edited my comment above.