Is Meta's Superintelligence Overhaul a Sign Its AI Goals Are Struggling?

Comments

• just_another_person@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Who fucking cares?

  source

  • logicbomb@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Yeah, if you care so much, why don’t you just ask the superintelligent AI for an answer?

    source
• phutatorius@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Its AI goals are bullshit.

  I hope that their failure crashes Meta.

  source
• tal@lemmy.today ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  From an organizational standpoint, it doesn’t sound unreasonable to me.

  The group will be split into four smaller groups, according to a New York Times report. One group will focus on AI research, another one on infrastructure and hardware projects, one on AI products, and another one on building out AI superintelligence, a hypothetical AI system that could outperform human intelligence on any and all scales.

  I mean, they have different skillsets, a fair bit of that is going to be on decoupled timelines, they have different levels of risk, and the technical expertise is going to differ. One succeeding or failing isn’t tightly coupled to another doing so. Sure, they all relate to one thing or another to something that has been called “AI”, but that’s a pretty broad group.

  source

  • sepi@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Thaumaturgy is a different skillset too. Why fon't they have a team doing this?

    source
• nymnympseudonym@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  This particular coding leaderboard matches my own personal experience. Llama4 is hitting ~15% ; Claude Opus4 ~70% (I haven’t used others personally)

  source
• griff@lemmings.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  The incredibly great wisdom of Broccoli Boy Zuck

  source