Invertedouroboros

@Invertedouroboros@lemmy.world

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Former UK Prime Minister Liz Truss to launch ‘free speech’ social media platform⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago⁩:

  “Lettuce Speak”.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Did we all give up on calling him Drumpf?⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  I think… there was a kernel of a decent instinct there. At the point that John Oliver bit came out I feel like we were all kinda just marveling at how far stupid playground insults managed to get Trump. “Well, ok, maybe he’s onto something. Let’s try it and see what happens.” Was a fine reaction for the time, but I think it was best abandoned quickly.

  In 2025, not useful in the slightest. I don’t know what is precisely, but I don’t think it’s petty name calling.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Meta’s AI Profiles Are Already Polluting Instagram and Facebook With Slop⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Obviously this is all stupid and you’ll find problems anywhere you choose to look.

  The problem I’m finding is this, if Facebook truly is betting on AI becoming better as a way to encourage growth then why are they further poisoning their own datasets? Like ok, even if you exclude everything your own bots say from your training data, which you could probably do since you know who they are, this is still encouraging more AI slop on the platform. You don’t know how much of the “engagement” your driving (which they are likely just turning around and feeding back into the AI training set) is actually human, AI grifter, or someone poisoning the well by making your AIs talk to themselves. If you actually cared to make your AI better, then you can’t use any of the responses to your bots as most of them will be of dubious providence at best.

  Personally I’m rooting on the coming Hapsburg-AI issue so I don’t really have that much of a problem with Facebook deciding more poison is a brilliant business move. But uh… seems real dumb if your actually interested in having an actually functional LLM.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨America's Next Health Secretary Enjoying A Meal With His Future Boss and Colleagues⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Honestly, in my social circle we’re all kinda treating it like this… strange, self-inflicted, natural disaster. Like we can’t even really joke about it, still. It’s like we all know it’s gonna be bad, the only question is how bad it’s going to be. There’s a lot I’m hoping is over-reaction, but honestly that’s a pretty shitty thing to hope for and a hard hope to maintain all things considered.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨It was rigged?⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  You can have a little bit of CTE, as a treat.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Beware Hollywood’s digital demolition: it’s as if your favourite films and TV shows never existed⁩ ⁨⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  What a brilliant way to put it, “theft from the public domain”. I’m gonna have to remember that one.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Beware Hollywood’s digital demolition: it’s as if your favourite films and TV shows never existed⁩ ⁨⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  I’m not against nuclear power, but could they have concocted a worse set of motivations? Restarting Three Mile Island to power Microsoft’s AI ambitions? Shit reads like something a super villan would cook up.