European Union set to revise cookie law, admits cookie banners are annoying::undefined
European Union set to revise cookie law, admits cookie banners are annoying
Submitted 9 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world [bot] to technology@lemmy.world
https://www.techspot.com/news/101396-european-union-set-revise-cookie-law-admits-cookie.html
Comments
noodlejetski@lemm.ee 9 months ago
thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca 9 months ago
If you’re a safari user (desktop and mobile): oblador.github.io/hush/
jojo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 months ago
Consent-o-matic also works on iOS and safari
Octopus1348@lemy.lol 9 months ago
Thanks! It works on mobile (Nightly).
noodlejetski@lemm.ee 9 months ago
should work on Android regardless of the branch.
HejMedDig@feddit.dk 9 months ago
Thanks!
maynarkh@feddit.nl 9 months ago
The actual EU documents say the complete opposite. They say that the cookie law is going nowhere, this new thing is a framework for easier compliance with the existing law for big business.
From the [letter issued by the EU Supervisory Authority to the Commission about this](Chair of the European Data Protection Board):
While voluntary commitments [of companies to adhere to the GDPR] may be a useful tool, the pledging principles should by no means be used to circumvent legal obligations. In addition, undertaking voluntary commitments does not equate or guarantee compliance with the applicable data protection and privacy framework.
merc@sh.itjust.works 9 months ago
The banners should stay. If a site doesn’t use cookies, you don’t get a banner. The sites choose for themselves if they want to use cookies and put up an obnoxious banner, or not use cookies.
them@lemmy.world 9 months ago
I think enforcing some universal API for this would be a decent compromise. This would allow browsers to handle the UI which means the user can set a global preference or set it per site. At the very least the UI would be uniform so you wouldn’t have to fight dark patterns trying to disable them.
kebabslob@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 months ago
What are you on about? The banners and cookie abuse should go
ViscloReader@lemmy.world 9 months ago
I trust they’ll do a good job focusing on privacy rather than outright going back to “no banner, cookies for everyone!”
pdxfed@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Install privacy badge, turn on “automatically send do not track” and those things all just melt away when you go to a new site as it processes almost all sites automatically.
DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz 9 months ago
The “do not track” is really just you asking them politely not to track you, they are not obligated to stop tracking…more often than not, it is completely ignored and they track you anyway.
noodlejetski@lemm.ee 9 months ago
…and the request itself can be used as a data point.
pdxfed@lemmy.world 9 months ago
California’s regulations have teeth but there are some exclusions and exemptions, I guess like most laws it’ll only be followed if suing and getting damages is easy and results made public.
beefontoast@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Is it possible to do this on mobile phone browsers?
pdxfed@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Yup, that’s where it’s the most valuable to not have to drag fingers around and whatnot, easier if you needed to deal with popup on PC with mouse and keyboard and whatnot.
smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 9 months ago
There are no cookie banners, at least not nessesary ones. There is just a consent requirement for processing personal data.
lolcatnip@reddthat.com 9 months ago
Um, what? Almost every consent banner I’ve seen had specifically asked about cookies, and usually nothing else.
smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 9 months ago
This is a misconception many sites fall into. They really do not have to ask for just cookies, it’s like there were asking to use CSS or JavaScript :).
LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Can’t wait until 28 when people realize how nice cell phones used to be.
GiddyGap@lemm.ee 9 months ago
A major political entity admitting mistake and correcting based on feedback. How refreshing.