This seems really cool, but my two main thoughts when I see something like this are: how badly are they misreporting this, and will anyone bother writing an article about the retraction a few months down the road when it turns out this was something completely different?
Cracked Piece of Metal Heals Itself in Experiment That Stuns Scientists
Submitted 1 year ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to physics@mander.xyz
https://www.sciencealert.com/cracked-piece-of-metal-heals-itself-in-experiment-that-stuns-scientists
Comments
millie@beehaw.org 1 year ago
PixeIOrange@feddit.de 1 year ago
“A possible explanation involves a process known as cold welding, which occurs under ambient temperatures whenever metal surfaces come close enough together for their respective atoms to tangle together.”
Am i silly or where is the difference? Cold welding is known long times, nothing to be stunned about.
carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Any headline that talks about “stunning”, “shocking”, or “angering” scientists gets an immediate red flag for me, right up there with “breakthrough” battery tech.
WadeTheWizard@kbin.social 1 year ago
New battery tech shocks scientist after breakingthrough insulated casing.
carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 1 year ago
🤯
niktemadur@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Middle-aged men in white labcoats and with clipboard in hand, using the words “uncanny” and “eerie” in vague sentences.
blackbrook@mander.xyz 1 year ago
Yes, and it’s particularly obnoxious when they seem to have twisted a quote as an excuse for this: ‘“This was absolutely stunning to watch first-hand,” said materials scientist Brad Boyc.’ I’m pretty sure that use of the word means “beautiful”, not “shocking.”