Submitted 11 months ago by chrischryse@lemmy.world to nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
Again, excuse my ignorance, I’m just curious since I don’t really know the context and everything else I found has confused me. So I’m hoping someone might be able to explain it and give me much better context.
It’s saying that antisemitism isn’t real but only in the imagination of Jews, while it’s a fact that Jews systemiletical work on the eradication of white people.
For those out of the loop, here is the Guardian article on the matter.
lol thanks just updated my post todays one of those days
A tweet posted by @breakingbaht on Wednesday night read: “Jewish communties have been pushing the exact kind of dialectical hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them.”
The second part of the post is not easy to understand for me.
With this you can (start to) decide by yourself.
Yeah, it’s like the second paragraph was written by a different person. Maybe he was high.
Pretty sure they’re a grown up not a tween.
So… honest question here. The original tweeter.
Does anybody wanna take a stab at what the heck ‘Dialectical Hatred’ even… means?
I mean, hatred, yeah. that’s obvious.
Dialectical… though is usually a method of discourse that’s similar to debating- that is, two opposing view points hashing it out. (it differs some from debating, particularly in the arguments that are considered appropriate- for example, debate allows emotional arguments where dialectics doesn’t)
Can’t find any evidence of that being a term prior to the tweet. I’d guess one of
He tweets a lot of things. Gonna have to link to the specific one you are curious about.
Emperor@feddit.uk 11 months ago
This piece from The Atlantic goes into the detail of it.
It’s an incredibly dangerous lie to be spreading but the tweet wouldn’t make sense unless you knew the broader context (the Great Replacement conspiracy theory), which Musk clearly does or he wouldn’t have gone out of his way to reply. He has tried to row back on it since but just made his take on this more blatant.