I was wondering how long it would take the media to frame the Israel-Palestine crisis as another “China bad” story.
How Chinese firm linked to repression of Uyghurs aids Israeli surveillance in West Bank
Submitted 1 year ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
autotldr@lemmings.world [bot] 1 year ago
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Surveillance cameras now cover the Damascus Gate, the main entrance into the old city of Jerusalem and one of the only public areas for Palestinians to gather socially and hold demonstrations.
The Guardian first reported that Hikvision enabled police clients to set up alarms for when cameras detect any type of protest activity such as “gathering crowds to disrupt order in public places”, “unlawful assembly, procession, demonstration” and threats to “petition”.
Amnesty investigators said the cameras are at high risk of being connected to Mabat 2000, an Israeli police-run facial-recognition surveillance network that spans the entire city of East Jerusalem.
Ultimately, Palestinians “don’t need to see” that the cameras are employing facial recognition to “know that they are being watched at every turn”, said Matthew Mahmoudi, an Amnesty International researcher on AI and human rights.
“Even their family life and the sort of very mundane everyday actions suddenly become acts of resistance in the face of this ubiquitous surveillance apparatus that underpins much of how apartheid is exacted on Palestinians,” Mahmoudi added.
According to the report, Amnesty International’s Digital Verification Corps analyzed and verified the authenticity of 15 videos that showed Palestinians being detained “where surveillance technologies appeared to have been used for registration, identification or recording”.
The original article contains 1,238 words, the summary contains 207 words. Saved 83%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
Therealgoodjanet@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Oh look, one genocidal country helping the other, making genocide easier…
BlueBockser@programming.dev 1 year ago
Therealgoodjanet@lemmy.world 1 year ago
So, let’s look at the definition of genocide and see where Israel lands here.
Definition Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide
Article II In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
Killing members of the group;
Source: the UN
So; let’s have a quick look at these points:
The head of the UN, Craig Mokhiber, just retired and called it unequivocally a genocide, here’s a source for that, but if you don’t like this source, you can just Google this and find plenty of other sources.
So, please tell me. How does Israel not fit as a genocidal regime?
masquenox@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Right, right… totally no genocidal behavior to see here.
Madison420@lemmy.world 1 year ago
You mean aside from those times they said specifically they were attacking civilians to “get to” Hamas access that the civilians are “human shields”.
Just an fyi I think in a few years your georing to feel really fuckin bad about your rhetoric.