Privacy advocate challenges YouTube’s ad blocking detection::Irish eyes may not be smiling
My computer, my freedom!
I can do whatever I want.
Privacy advocate challenges YouTube's ad blocking detection
Submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world [bot] to technology@lemmy.world
https://www.theregister.com/2023/10/26/privacy_advocate_challenges_youtube/?td=rt-3a
Comments
lnxtx@feddit.nl 1 year ago
Redrum714@lemm.ee 1 year ago
So can the web server your trying to access lol
sir_reginald@lemmy.world 1 year ago
the adblock detection is happening at the client side with JavaScript code executed on my browser. As the original comment said: my device, my freedom. I’ll be blocking any JavaScript I don’t like and nobody can stop me from doing that.
long_chicken_boat@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
the web server? absolutely!
the arbitrary code they send to my browser? I must be able to choose what to execute in my device.
Sensitivezombie@lemmy.zip 1 year ago
Serious question: YouTube is a business and owned by a public corporation and not a FOSS so they can dictate how they want to run their platform. They want to run ads and blacklist ad blockers running on their platform. They have created a premium subscription for those who don’t want ads. I understand the public outrage, of course. My question is why can’t they do what they want with their own platform? I guess I’m finding it hard to see a different perspective. FYI, I’m in the process of distancing myself from Google services as much as possible.
tabular@lemmy.world 1 year ago
People should always be able to control what is downloaded and shown on their screen. Google go beyond selling goods/services when they control how using the internet works with changes the browser most people use. Google could just paywall the content but they want to dictate their cake and eat it.
Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 1 year ago
Because corporations and businesses are still bound to the law of the country they offer their services in.
Just because some hillbilly bar in Kansas allows minors to smoke and drink doesn’t mean that’s legal because it’s their place.
2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de 1 year ago
When I visit the YouTube site, all that happens is their server sends data to my browser that it requested. What I/my browser do with that data (especially how and whether to display parts of the site) is up to me.
youngGoku@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I use ad blocker, and I think it’s fine if YouTube wants to try to stop it.
Buteventually someone will find a workaround for their efforts to stop it.
It’s a never ending game of cat and mouse.
Hylactor@sopuli.xyz 1 year ago
Personally I wouldn’t mind paying for YouTube premium, but it’s priced at least twice as high as I’m willing to pay. Perhaps if they had full premium with YouTube music at the current too high price, and then a “premium lite” that was simply no ads and but no YouTube music either at half or less the full price. Personally I just don’t want ads, I don’t want to over pay for music just because I don’t want ads.
linearchaos@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I don’t know, seems kind of trivial to say that you’re tracking if they’re watching videos or not rather than your tracking if they’re running a piece of software. I wonder if in the end game they don’t just start wrapping their videos in DRM.
asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Tracking has the ability to follow someone to other sites.
BURN@lemmy.world 1 year ago
They’ll do what twitch did and embed the ads into the video stream so you can’t block them without blocking the video itself
autotldr@lemmings.world [bot] 1 year ago
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Interview Last week, privacy advocate (and very occasional Reg columnist) Alexander Hanff filed a complaint with the Irish Data Protection Commission (DPC) decrying YouTube’s deployment of JavaScript code to detect the use of ad blocking extensions by website visitors.
YouTube’s open hostility to ad blockers coincides with the recent trial deployment of a popup notice presented to web users who visit the site with an ad-blocking extension in their browser – messaging tested on a limited audience at least as far back as May.
“In early 2016 I wrote to the European Commission requesting a formal legal clarification over the application of Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive (2002/58/EC) and whether or not consent would be required for all access to or storage of information on an end user’s device which was not strictly necessary,” Hanff told The Register.
"Specifically whether the deployment of scripts or other technologies to detect an ad blocker would require consent (as it is not strictly necessary for the provision of the requested service and is purely for the interests of the publisher).
Hanff disagrees, and maintains that "The Commission and the legislators have been very clear that any access to a user’s terminal equipment which is not strictly necessary for the provision of a requested service, requires consent.
“This is also bound by CJEU Case C-673/17 (Planet49) from October 2019 which all Member States are legally obligated to comply with, under the [Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union] – there is no room for deviation on this issue,” he elaborated.
The original article contains 1,030 words, the summary contains 258 words. Saved 75%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 1 year ago
It was high time.
schwim@reddthat.com 1 year ago
YT’s push into ad-blocker blocking did the same for me that Reddit’s API change did, that being it was enough of a push for me to stop using their platform. In Reddit’s case, I get my fix from Lemmy and in YT’s case, I use Freetube to watch videos. In both cases, I’m sure they’re not losing money in my absence but I do feel better not giving them the data that I used to.
n3m37h@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Grayjay.app Thank Louis Rossmann & FUTO
long_chicken_boat@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Louis Rossmann can go to fuck himself and his source available app that he keeps calling open source.
Newpipe existed long before Grayjay and will probably be there when grayjay dies since Newpipe’s license allows community forks. If the Newpipe team ceases development, others will take their place. If Rossmann ceases development, his app is left for dead
schwim@reddthat.com 1 year ago
I’ve got Grayjay on my phone but I very rarely watch YT on it so I’ve not really used it yet. Almost 100% of my watching happens on the PC and I’ve absolutely fallen in love with Freetube. No shorts spam, sponsorblock, more useful features on the player, it’s pretty fantastic.