The Meta glassholes have arrived

Comments

• FlyingSquid@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  It’s really not the same. One of the biggest issues with Glassholes was that it wasn’t clear they were wearing something unusual at first sight, especially from certain angles. That you didn’t know you were being recorded didn’t help, and I’m guessing that the Quest 3 isn’t secretive about that like Google Glass. But even if it is, I think everyone is going to do their best to avoid the guy walking around with that thing strapped to their head.

  source

  • ijeff@lemdro.id ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    There’s no external indication when someone is recording the passthrough footage on the Quest 3.

    source

    • thejml@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      It’s a Meta device, I’m sure it’s ALWAYS recording. Whether or not the used keeps the recording is another matter.

      So if the person is wearing one, just assume it’s recording and facial recognition is occurring in post.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • oatscoop@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      There is apparently an indicator for when the device is recording.

      source
  • SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    From what I remember Google glass had an indicator when it was recording, people just assumed it doesn’t and/or it’s always recording

    source

    • Marruk@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      That’s correct. The indicator light was pretty obvious.

      I always found it fascinating how upset people get about the idea of a novel device recording them without permission, but it is a complete non-issue that a familiar device (the common smart phone) could also record them without permission with less of a chance of them noticing.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • lloram239@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Quest 3 isn’t secretive about that like Google Glass.

    It’s a VR headset that provides the user with a live video feed, it records 100% of the time. If the cameras stop recording the person wearing it would be blind.

    Meta has another set of glasses that have an optional recording function, along with an LED indicator as well as a check to make sure that the LED isn’t covered.

    source
• tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  On the one hand I’d love a HUD which could, for example, remind me of the names of people I’d met before, or notes like ‘remember to talk to fred about his shrubbery’. Or tell me which shops I’m looking at are open, or give me directions to my destination… or random shit like the name of the plant I’m currently looking at. You can do some of this with a phone but in-vision is so much more useful IMO.

  OTOH the people capable of creating such technology are meta, google… and I don’t trust them one bit.

  source

  • uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I too along for the future (a century from now, if the world weren’t burning) of an actually useful augmented reality that didn’t continuously advertise at me.

    source

    • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Current industry analysts predict 2027 for AR glasses from Apple. They will be a game changer. Huge development is happening with miniature displays. I think the challenge will be processing on light frames, so I suspect it will be offloaded to one’s phone.

      source
  • Pxtl@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Yeah, this. And I don’t need a fully immersive experience for that. Like, Glass had enough for that - a camera for facial recognition, a screen for info. You could do the same if you mounted a camera on an earbud and put the display on a smartwatch.

    I don’t want Augmented Reality, I just want a dashboard/status bar for real life. A little screen in the corner of my view would solve that.

    source
  • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Apple is likely going this way as well. And honestly? I’d be down. I’d be paying an arm and a leg, and I wouldn’t have as much access as I’d like, but I know my data would be safe*. You can fault Apple for a lot of things, but they don’t fuck around with privacy, going as far as to reject the demands of the FBI to open up the phone of a dead terrorist.

    *: Assuming Apple doesn’t 180 on its stance for privacy.

    source
• Pxtl@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Gargoyles represent the embarrassing side of the Central Intelligence Corporation. Instead of using laptops, they wear their computers on their bodies, broken up into separate modules that hang on the waist, on the back, on the headset. They serve as human surveillance devices, recording everything that happens around them. Nothing looks stupider; these getups are the modern-day equivalent of the slide-rule scabbard or the calculator pouch on the belt, marking the user as belonging to a class that is at once above and far below human society.

  – Snow Crash, by Neil Stephenson

  source

  • uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    It pleases me that Hiro becomes a Gargoyle.

    But maybe because I totally was one, with a programmable HP calculator on my hip, I use reverse Polish notation to this day.

    source
  • Pulptastic@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    At least the gargoyles in Snowcrash owned their data, selling it for profit to afford their tacky lifestyle. These new gargoyles give all their data to our surveillance megacorp overlords for free.

    source
• FoundTheVegan@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Nothing awkward at all about just randomly holding your arm out to watch TV while walking around the world. Sounds like a very relaxing experince having everyone stare at you while in an elevator.

  And if someone doesn't want to be recorded, they have to explain "Don't worry, it's just Facebook that's watching."

  Legit gross behavior.

  source

  • Rouxibeau@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Yes, Facebook is disgusting, as is Google and other large tech companies; but that’s just a bad take. You’re already being recorded by CCTV pretty much everywhere you go in public. The issue isn’t and shouldn’t be about being recorded, but instead about what is being done with the recorded data. I know that security tapes are going to be overwritten after some period; tech wants to feed all their data into advertising profiles and AI.

    source
  • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    And if someone doesn’t want to be recorded, they have to explain “Don’t worry, it’s just Facebook that’s watching.”

    In America at least, anywhere in public is fair game for recording. You have no expectation of privacy (from being seen) out and about in the world anyway, and that applies to recordings as well.

    Should it be this way? I’m honestly torn. But the long and the short of it is, if you’re somewhere that doesn’t expressly forbid video recording, assume you’re always on camera. Because you likely are.

    source

    • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Yup, though that doesn’t mean those recordings can necessarily be legally published or used. Clearly it’s not the case in most of the US, or people just don’t care to enforce it, but in many parts of the EU you can get in serious legal trouble if you do upload it in a way where people can be recognized, especially if what you release can count as defamation.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• Strayce@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Meanwhile I still feel weird taking photos of inanimate objects in public spaces in case someone thinks I’m creeping on them.

  source

  • dojan@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I’m like this too. Unless it’s obvious I’m taking photos of my dog, I feel really weird about it. I like taking photos of random things I find interesting or pleasing to look at while we’re out for walks. Like a random forgotten plushie, or a nice tree, or the lake, or a rock, or a stump. Anything really. If there’s people around though, I tend to not pull my phone out because it feels invasive. Image Image

    source

    • Strayce@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      These are both stunning in completely different ways.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • HerbalGamer@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      that’s a good pic of that plushie

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • iegod@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      I can’t imagine living life too scared to do the things that I value. You’re in public. Sack up

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • Deceptichum@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Those fucking Jellycat's mate.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • FlyingSquid@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I don’t worry that people will think I’m creeping on them, but I worry that they’ll find out what I’m taking a picture of and either be weirded out or laugh at me. I don’t know why that bothers me because I wouldn’t care if it actually happened.

    source

    • tburkhol@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Anticipation is its own thing. Anticipation of travel is the main reason I never travel. I’m rarely bothered by the actual journey; I just don’t want to have it hanging over me.

      source
  • Kazumara@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Even worse if you want to take a photo of a nice public space, like a historical square, or a park or something!

    source
• alienanimals@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  People being recorded by cameras 24/7 when in public: How dare these glassholes record me!

  source
• TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Oooh nice! A surveillance device that also functions as a gateway to endless ads AND a “please bully me!” sign.

  source

  • Rouxibeau@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    GJ normalizing bullying as a method of social correction.

    source

    • TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Thank you, it’s often so thankless so it’s nice to be appreciated.

      source
• beesyrup@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I like how they are called glassholes. It sounds like another word I like.

  source

  • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Next life goal: get internship at Meta and adjust the profanity filter very slightly so that if you type “glasshole” in a Facebook post, it will come out as “gl***hole”.

    source
  • ZILtoid1991@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Someone forgot to do their focus group testing, or, even better, forgot to use their common sense.

    source

    • snooggums@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Pretty sure the author is using it as a disparaging term for the jackoffs that were wearing the headsets for attention.

      source
• TheWiseAlaundo@lemmy.whynotdrs.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Somehow I don’t think the Quest 3 is going to be a problem. The battery only lasts a couple hours, and you look dumb as hell wearing it in public. Unless the point is to look dumb as hell in public, then mission accomplished.

  source

  • ramblinguy@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I already look dumb as hell in public, what’s a little bit more dumbness anyways

    source
• Crow@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  It’s a known fact when wearing a mask people are able to experience less social anxiety and worry about how they’re perceived. I wouldn’t be surprised if wearing a big headset on your face has a similar effect for people’s social behaviour.

  source

  • tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Even sunglasses help… so I expect it would do that, but then you’d have to offset it by realizing you looked like a complete idiot.

    source
  • cynar@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    It’s impressively true. I build an interesting perspective shifting rig, for a festival. It let you see yourself in the 3rd person (think GTA follow cam). I was a lot more confident interacting with people I didn’t know, while wearing it, despite looking like a complete weirdo. 😁

    source

    • Crow@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      That’s so cool though.

      source
• BeautifulMind@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Yeah just saw an ad for the Ray-Ban surveillance Wayfarer glasses. Ray-Ban has been dead to me ever since it was sold to Luxotica (the near-monopoly that explains why $20 glasses cost $180). It’s kind of perfect now to see overpriced-for-no-good-reason branding being zombied yet further

  source
• illi@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Why wouldanyone want to do that?

  source
• dasJot@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Wonder how long it takes for the first Tesla driver to total his car this way…

  source
• coffeebiscuit@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I guess it’s time to invest in spraypaint …

  source

  • Rouxibeau@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Right. Let’s all get assault charges by destroying someone else’s expensive technology.

    source
• autotldr@lemmings.world [bot] ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  This is the best summary I could come up with:

  ---

  Over the weekend, as buyers got their first uninterrupted stretches of time with the new Meta Quest 3 headset, some started posting videos of themselves interacting with the real world instead of playing games.

  Sure, it’s cool to blast low-poly baddies breaking through your walls, but isn’t it more technically impressive that Meta’s new headset lets you cook a meal or sweep your floors or enjoy a fancy coffee on a beautiful day without ever taking off the machine?

  And, in the video you already saw atop this post, XR and AI booster Cix Liv went nearly full Glasshole by walking straight into a San Francisco coffee shop and placing an order, without bothering to hide the cafe’s address.

  But that was a decade ago, and I argued last year that our definition of privacy, our tolerance for public photography, and our resistance to wearable technology have all changed considerably since Google first introduced its headset.

  Smartphone cameras everywhere is now the norm, and small businesses often benefit from an influencer plug; Ng was fine with me naming Fiddle Fig Cafe in this story.

  Then again, if I saw someone walking into a cafe with a bulbous white object atop their face with multiple camera slits, I’d just automatically assume they were recording absolutely everything.

  ---

  The original article contains 639 words, the summary contains 215 words. Saved 66%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  source